×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

compressed air: Boeing tyres

compressed air: Boeing tyres

compressed air: Boeing tyres

(OP)
what is the typical compressed air requirement for inflating Boeing 737 tyres ( CFM @ ...PSI)?

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres


Mechanicaldup, I believe it isn't compressed air but nitrogen that fills the tires to avoid combustion when heat is developed from friction as when landing and braking.

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres


BigInch, I cannot grasp the truth of IR's statement under the heading of Better air pressure retention:

Quote:

With nitrogen the diffusion is 30 to 40 percent lower than oxygen.
which appears to contradict the laws of effusion and diffusion of gaseous molecules. Can you ?

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

No, I certainly can't.  I must confess that I can only see two reasons to use N2, theoretically, you can save an ounce or two of weight, and reducing potential combustion dangers, although I believe that titanium will combust under 100% N2 atmosphere at certain conditions.  Weight does not seem to be a valid reason, but then again, I don't own 5000 trucks running 24-7.  As for this IR article, I just happened to discover it when I was looking for a compressor, so never missing an opportunity to heat up a discussion, I posted it here to see what response it would generate.  So, now that the hook got set (in my mouth), I've decided the best way to get this whole thing explained is to invite the horse to talk.  I've asked Ingersol Rand to explain it.  It will be interesting to see what witchcraft they are relying on as a basis for making that statement.  I will report back on any answer they may be willing to give us.

   Going the Big Inch! worm
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

Still running this out,

Aircraft reasoning is combustion, stability and oxidation; nothing about diffusion.

http://www.goodyearaviation.com/faq.html

3. USE DRY NITROGEN GAS (WHEN REQUIRED)
Nitrogen will not sustain combustion and will reduce degradation of the liner material, casing plies and wheel due to oxidation."

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/1999/news_release_990406a.html

"A maximum-energy RTO is a dramatic test that involves accelerating an airplane with fully worn brakes to a takeoff speed of nearly 200 mph, and bringing it to a complete stop using only the brakes and the wing spoilers. Engine thrust reversers are not used to help slow down the airplane in this test. The brakes glow orange-red and reach temperatures of more than 3,500 degrees Fahrenheit from the energy absorbed while halting the airplane. Shortly after the stop, wheel fuse plugs melt to safely release tire pressure."

http://www.airmichelin.com/space.html

"The space shuttle tires are filled with nitrogen (as are most aircraft tires) due to its stability at different altitudes and temperatures. Due to the extremely heavy loads these bias ply tires are inflated to 340 psi (main gear) and 300 psi (nose gear)."


http://www.skytreads.com/mounting.htm

"Inflating With Nitrogen

Many regulatory agencies require the use of nitrogen when inflating tires for aircraft above a specified Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW). Michelin recommends the use of nitrogen when inflating all aircraft tires. Nitrogen provides a stable, inert inflation gas while eliminating the introduction of moisture into the tire cavity.

Aircraft operating procedures for initial inflation and adjustments must comply with applicable instructions as given in FAR 25 or JAR 25.
Oxygen concentration should never exceed 5%."

   Going the Big Inch! worm
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres


I believe the mentioned limit % O2 has something to do with the partial pressure of oxygen to start a chemical reaction at the temperatures in use.

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

Here's the word from IR, phone number censored, e-mail me if you want it.  I'm letting this one die on the vine.  I must do some real work now.

Quote:

"Unfortunately, I am not one of the "experts" on our nitrogen system.  The
explanation that I have heard is that the nitrogen molecules are larger
than oxygen molecules so it will take longer for them to permeate the tire
wall.

If you have other questions about the nitrogen system, you may contact:

908-###-###

Thanks"

   Going the Big Inch! worm
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres


Both molecules have about the same diameter, the nitrogen bond length is even smaller (110 pm) than oxygen's (121 pm). Thus, it cannot serve as an explanation for the massive selective escape of oxygen from a tire.

Assuming the reported comparative tire pressure loss is correct, I tend to believe that oxygen is preferentially adsorbed (physically or chemically) on the carbon-rich material of the tire, and as a result its molecule dissociates.
The generated atoms are indeed smaller and lighter than the molecules and can permeate out easily. Let's recall that the energy of oxygen's endothermic dissociation is about half of nitrogen's.

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

I think automobile-wise its an urban myth.  From what I read, I believe it is justified in the case for aircraft tires that are seldom at full pressure and run with soft walls.  Otherwise I feel it is of highly questionable value and even less technical merrit, except for the case of extremely hot brakes, or if it has any merrit at all, its definately not worth the trouble or expense.  I can say I've had quite a few vehicles by now and I've never ever used N2 to fill the tires and I've never experienced a blowout due to tire oxidation, so really I ain't worried.  

For terrestial use, it must be a Madison Avenue 2thumbsup ploy.  
                        

   Going the Big Inch! worm
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

See: http://www.diffusion-polymers.com/Gas%20Diffusion.htm

for diffusity for different gases in different materials.  Note the last entry is Butyl Rubber.

Note also that the diffusivity difference between oxygen and nitrogen appears to be even bigger than stated in the supposedly biased statement from the Irtools website.

The difference in diffusivity might be a by-product of the reactivity difference of oxygen vs nitrogen, rather than size difference.

TTFN



RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

Not doubting it a bit, but I'm still not buying a N2 filling station! lol Least not till my 747 comes in.

   Going the Big Inch! worm
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 14th Edn. pages 10.66 to 10.69 gives permeation constants for gases through polymers, including various rubbers & blends.  In agreement with data for butyl rubber in IRstuff's link, oxygen permeates about 3x as fast as nitrogen through various rubbers.  Water vapor is much faster, 100 -1009x, than nitrogen.  After parking a plane an extended period in a humid, tropical clime, considerable water vapor would be present inside the tires.  Would not want to land a plane with ice crystals  on the inside walls of tires after a high altitude flight.  

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

A tire dealer once told me that tires filled with N2 last longer because the rubber does not lose it's plasticity in an N2 atmosphere as fast as it does in an oxidizing O2 one.

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres


Now it becomes a clearer situation, at least for me.

• Coming back to the subject of nitrogen-inflated tires. It is not a diffusion process as claimed by the nitrogen supporters, it is permeation, as highlighted by kenvlach, a totally different concept. Permeation refers almost exclusively to polymers and is caused by differences in chemical potential. Example: loss of carbon dioxide from plastic bottles for carbonated soft drinks.

• Permeation is characterized by a coefficient P, which is the product of two seemingly counteracting transport effects: the diffusion coefficient D through the pores (favouring nitrogen), and the solubility (molecular transport) coefficient S of the permeant gas in the matrix (adding high mobility to oxygen).

• The process of permeation through a polymeric barrier is said to consist of four steps: absorption of the gas into the polymer wall; solubility in the matrix; movement by diffusion along a concentration gradient; and desorption from the outer wall.

• It appears that the polarity of the polymer functional groups, chain symmetry, attraction between polymer chains, glass transition temperatures, and crystallinity all affect the permeation rates. Example: oxygen permeates 10 million times faster through poly(dimethylsiloxane) than through poly(acrylonitrile).
 
• Permeability is also influenced by temperature, differential pressures, humidity, fillers, additives, thickness, etc. Some of them, by increasing the pathway and its tortuosity, decrease the permeation of a gas molecule.

• Gases, in general, have lower permeation coefficients in thermoplastics than in elastomers because segmental movements of the former are frozen-in below the transition temperatures.

RE: compressed air: Boeing tyres

I guess it was inevitable, as last night on the evening news I think I caught the tail end of a promotion for, you guessed it, nitrogen in car tires!  The hooks appeared to be claim for 3 point something percent more gas mileage and some sort of better response to temperature (and of course they added the good ol’ boys and gals appeal that it was used by NASCAR  etc.!)  This may now have even been picked up by some major car service chain(s).
Kind of ironically (in light of what I read on this thread) a few years ago I was continually plagued by air leaks/flat tires in some also very old tubed rubber tires I still have on the front of a sizeable though many decades old tractor I regularly crank up and use not at any high speed but at a leisurely pace on my property.  I was some tired of having to continually re-inflate these tires, and for various reasons I didn't want to try to dismount/fix/replace/remount these tires either.  While I suspect this is quite a formal no-no in many fields and I would not recommend this for anyone else, I nevertheless clamped a garden hose end on a short air inflation hose and filled the tires with water (along with I guess whatever plain ol' nasty air was in same)  under a little pressure with my garden hose.  I believe it is not my imagination that I noticed a HUGE decrease in my required attention, at least thus far, to this matter, and I don't think the tires ever again went fully flat as they had before.  Also while I guess my rims might eventually rust off, I kind of like the extra front weight when I put a heavy implement or lift on the back end.  I guess it all depends on your vantage point/application, but it might now take a lot of convincing for me to now put nitrogen in these particular tires!     

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources