×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Thin-Out of ASME Heads

(OP)
Hello All,

    During the forming process of ASME Heads, where does the most Thin-out occur?  Or what area of the Head will see the highest stresses?  Thanks....

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Probably in the knuckle zone.

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Probably? I thought it is in the knuckle, after all. Any doubts about it?

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

The knuckle is somewhat wide, maybe 60deg or more. Does it get thinned mostly in the middle of it, or closer to the dome, or the skirt?
And what about hemispherical heads?

Konrad

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Call your head vendor?

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads


@SnTMan: pun intended?
:)


RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

SnTMan:
I think it depends on: grade, heat treatment, forming temperature, die condition (surface roughness, wear), lubrication, speed of forming... maybe something else. I don't expect my vendor to know much about it. What about yours?

Konrad

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

panduru, no I'm not that clever this early.

Konrad, if my head vendor could not tell me in general terms where the most thinning occured in his products I'd get a different one. I'm not talking to the 1/1000, but in general.

Regards,

Mike

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Well, the question was about ASME heads. Here (Poland) we have PN heads, DIN heads... smile The guy who uses ultrasound gage puts it on 4-5 points along the knuckle width, all 4 or 6 times around the head. Not asking the vendor smile

Konrad

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Generally the knuckle area is going to be the thinnest.

As a general practice we assume 1/16" for head thicknesses 1/2" thick and under and 15% for head thicknesses above 1/2".

Brian

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads


Life was certainly much better before I had to know that thinning could be at places other than the knuckle zone. Do we have to live with uncertainty now on, then? How would one provide thinning allowance for design?


RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

PN (Polish Norm) allows max 10% thining of hemispherical and elliptical heads. Which is not hard to achieve. Just put forming undertolerance of 10% to the calcs and that's it.

Konrad

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Sorry, I wanted to say "torispherical and elliptical". Must be the heat today...

Konrad

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Thanks Konrad. Of course, it would not be applicable to hemispherical heads.

 

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

panduru,
Many people simply order heads with a stipulated minimum thickness, and allow the head manufacturer to select the starting thickness.  Your head manufacturer knows his processes and their affect on thinning better than anyone else.

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads


@weldtek:

Now that sets me thinking, again !

So, the heads as delivered by the head manufacturer will have the ordered thickness at wherever is the minimum? Which would mean there's nothing the designer needs to factor-in for thinning?

It is generally believed that upto ten per cent thinning allowance is to be provided at design time, or in other words, the order will be placed for a head about 10% or so thicker than required by design. What about that, than?




RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

You can order minimum thickness, not bothering the input material. Nice to the designer. Only problem is you never know what's the actual thickness at the skirt. Might be a headache for production department. My welding engineer would probably spit in my cofee smile
Konrad

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

I don't mean to convey the idea that when we purchase heads we never know what the material thickness is going to be until the heads arrive.  We, like most people, have the heads quoted, and nominal thickness is part of the information given in the quote.  
Looking at this differently, you could cause yourself a great deal of grief if you lock your vendor in to a starting thickness, assuming that you'll end up with the minimum thickness needed by design.  It just makes sense to get the head manufacturer involved at the front end, they know the process, their equipment and its limitations.
With all due respect Konrad, it doesn't seem likely that the amount of additional thickness needed to compensate for material thinning is great enough to cause welding issues.  In most cases we're talking in the order of 1/8" to 1/4" of additional thickness.  Occasionally we have to taper the joint, but, we're not talking about headaches anything like you're going to have if you make assumptions on material thinning that don't hold true.  

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Weldtek, What if I put 10mm nominal thickness of the head, 10mm nominal thickness of the shell and the welding engineer assures that he has 10mm qualifications. And then he gets 12mm thick head skirt. I know, somebody should think about turning it down to 10 but what if nobody did? Welding 10mm to 12mm doesn't necessarilly take turning, because the difference can be smoothed by the weld. But if 12mm thick weld is not qualified- there's the headache!

Konrad

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

OK, here is how it is commonly done in the shell and tube game, at least in my part of the world. I am speaking of of 2:1 ellip heads, but other styles of head would be similar:

The design program calculates the minimum required head thickness including any corrosion, adds forming allowance and arrives at a nominal thickness. The forming allowance is based on the nominal thickness, and is something like: 1/8" up to 1" nom, 3/16" to 2" nom, and 1/4" over that. I don't know for certain but am sure these were arrived at with input from head vendors.

The designer has two choices: Go with the nominal thickness or specify the minimum thickness. The drawbacks to the former are that the head MAWP may be lower than actual, based on the head vendor's actual minimum and/or you may be buying a thicker head than is really required. Also your nominal may be in 1/16" increments, say 11/16" and everybody hates that.

The drawback to the latter is that nobody knows the nominal head thickness, but can guess pretty closely by applying the same rules the program uses, in which case it is generally more convenient to just call out the nominal.

A vendor we used all the time also published a chart showing minimum thicknesses of heads based on plate thickness and head diameter. These minimums were generally thicker than what would be indicated using the rules built into the program. So as a third alternative, a designer could specify a head by this published minimum. Of course, this is vendor specific.

It is a curious fact that one of the most important early tasks in the mechanical design is to arrrive at a head thickness and diameter that can be economcally obtained. After that, cylinder diameters and thicknesses could be confirmed, and the rest of the design could proceed with minimal chance of major redesign.

As for the welding engineer, if the design is done as above, there are no surprises for anybody.

It may seem picky to spend some extra time at the front to nail down exactly which head to buy, but after all, this is what design is all about.

Regards,

Mike

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Konrad,
In your example, the weld qualifications for 10mm would work because nominal joint thickness is the thinner of the two members joined ( see UW 40 (5)(a).0

SnTMan,
Exactly!

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

weldtek, not necessarily. If the transition between 10 and 12 is made by buildup on the 10mm plate- then you need 12mm qualification. The weld is 12mm thick.
Konrad

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Konrad,
Yes, I replied without thinking the question through.  The rules for dissimilar thickness weld procedures are given in Sec IX, QW 202.4, and for certain base metals, not all,  a qualification on 12 mm, for the case you cite, would be necessary.  I apologize for the confusion.

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

weldtek,
I see you worry about the qualifications.
in designing a vessel, if at the end of the day you need  example: 10 mm t that is including design MAWP + Corr. allow., you will have no choice but to add any mfr under-tol that you can think of to make up for the thin-out,

genb  
 

RE: Thin-Out of ASME Heads

Thank you, ccplnkr, for the valuable post.
.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources