×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Water Storage Tanks

Water Storage Tanks

Water Storage Tanks

(OP)
I'm checking anchor bolts on a flat-bottom welded steel water storage tank that has a 42' diameter, and is 106' tall.  It has (8)-1.375" anchor bolts, some slightly corroded.

With the tank built in the 1950's, I'm assuming that it was only designed for wind (not seismic).  The tank appears in good condition (needs painting) and has performed well over the past half century, so I don't feel that a seismic analysis is required, or warranted.  Is this an accurate assumption?  Is there some portion of the AWWA Standards that requires a seismic upgrade for older water tanks?

Also, anyone have a guess as to the probable wall thickness for such a tank?

Thanks in advance for any insights.

RE: Water Storage Tanks

I'm not aware of any requirement to upgrade tanks to current seismic designs, although many owners in high seismic zones have done so.  If so, it would be a regional requirement.  Adequate performance when there haven't been any earthquakes is certainly no guarantee that it will perform well if there is an earthquake.  If checking for seismic loads per current standards, it would help tremendously to have a set of drawings show foundation details.

Shell thickness is usually 2.6HD/12750, where H is depth to the bottom of the shell course, D is diameter, both in feet.  This may be rounded up to fractional thicknesses, or may have had a corrosion allowance added to it as well.  Shell plate would be thickest at the bottom and thinner farther up.

It is common, but not universal, practice to use the same thickness for repads as used for the shell plate, so you can get an idea there as well.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources