GD&T and Shipbuilding
GD&T and Shipbuilding
(OP)
Can anyone tell me if the application of GD&T in Shipbuilding is the same application as the Automotive Industry?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
1.1 General - This Standard establishes uniform practices for stating and interpreting dimensioning, tolerancing, and related requirements for use on engineering drawings and in related documents.
I think this answers your question
Best Regards,
Heckler
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SW2005 SP 5.0 & Pro/E 2001
Dell Precision 370
P4 3.6 GHz, 1GB RAM
XP Pro SP2.0
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
Never argue with an idiot. They'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience every time.
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
It can be used for any type of mechanical design.
Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-06)
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
This is the area of ISO that I think works better.
ISO tolerancing is based on size and fit class.
A 25mm long part has tighter dimesnions than a 2500mm long part.
"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."
Ben Loosli
Sr IS Technologist
L-3 Communications
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
The only problem comes in the confirmation methods. That could become a bit hairy since you probably have a 1 piece off situation and checking fixture may not apply.
Dave D.
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
In recreational shipbuilding, they still haven't actually grokked the concept of interchangeable parts, so GD&T would be a complete waste of time.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
I believe it was actually the part of the Royal Navy responsible for Torpedo Development.
looselib, I think you can achieve the same you just have to think about it a bit more. Plus there's more to GDT than size & fit class.
If you're in the US it's ASME Y14.5M, if the UK then BS8888, I'm sure other countries have there own standards.
BS8888 is essentially a list of all the relevant ISO, EN & BS specs and can be supplied as a kit.
So in essence I can think of no fundamental reason not to use it in shipbuilding.
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
Regards,
Namdac
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
http://www.iigdt.com/id81.htm
ht
ht
http://66
Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-06)
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
http://www.draftingzone.com/tips/tip39/
GDT actually came up just before WWII assuming Gary did his research, which I suspect he did.
I was taught that the issue of general tolerancing and quality control really came came to be an issue in WWI especially with respect to the size (calber) of shells etc.
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
It seems that the Singer sewing machine company had a hand in the early development of interchangability also, but I don't have any sources handy to show that.
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
The principle of interchangeability dates bact to at least the American Civil war think springfield and Enfield rifles.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Romans or something weren't into interchangeability but I doubt they had feature frames!
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
I guess I went off on a tangent!
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
Ken
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
adj.
1. Making contact at a single point or along a line; touching but not intersecting.
2. Irrelevant.
Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-06)
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
There is still advantages in tolerance studies and the use of MMC that has saved a few bad parts for me. Not to mention the 1.414 advantage over Cartesian coordinates.
Cheers
I know less and less every day
I don't know anything but the people that do.
RE: GD&T and Shipbuilding
I vote with you. If there is not a requirement for interchangeability, GD & T would be pretty much a waste of time. And furthermore, most likely result in increased cost resuting from training those who have probably not had any exposure to it.