×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Non-PE Reference Dilemma

Non-PE Reference Dilemma

Non-PE Reference Dilemma

(OP)
Rather than hijack ControlNovice's thread on PE Reference, this is a different twist to similar issues...

I was recently asked to provide a reference for someone applying to take a certification exam for registration in a specialty consulting area (not required to be an engineer or architect).  I mentored this person for many years and watched his progress, but have lost touch with his day-to-day activities over the past 5 or 6 years.  While I had contact with him, my review of his work was spotty and more related to corporate contracts and liability than to technical issues.

The review form pointedly asks for my assessment of his competence to act in this "registered" capacity.

Here's my problem.....

The registration is in a specialty consulting area that includes engineers and architects, but doesn't require either.  It is not a state licensing effort, but a "professional" association registration.  Many of the members of said organization seem to practice some level of pseudo-engineering and some even have the gall to state that they provide engineering or architectural functions, though they are not either (I'll take that up with my state board)(the ones who are licensed...no problem).

I guess my problem is philosophical and two-fold.... (1) Shouldn't their registration process and exam determine the initial competence, and (2) I'm not sure I want to condone such organizations that dilute or inadvertently subvert the licensed practices of engineering and architecture by supporting the registration of non-licensed professionals in closely related activities.

Your thoughts?......

RE: Non-PE Reference Dilemma

It seems like the main question is whether these folks really practice engineering or not (if not, then no problem, right?).

Can you tell us more about what they do or are you trying to protect some anonymity?

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: Non-PE Reference Dilemma

(OP)
electricpete...trying to protect anonimity.

It is one of those nebulous practice areas that closely interfaces with architecture/engineering and can easily cross over into, particularly, engineering.  An example...this consulting sometimes affects the loading on structures, which should be considered.  Many of those who practice this consulting are not qualified to assess the effect on structures.

While they are probably a bit better than the contractors of this specialty, I have seen catastrophic results when contractors have made such decisions.  Many of these consultants are former contractors.

RE: Non-PE Reference Dilemma

I would run, not walk, to my nearest state board and discuss this with them (figuratively speaking of course). They need to know your concerns. It is your duty as well.

Not only could it cause danger for the public, but it also subverts our profession as a whole and allows the poorly educated an enroute into taking the jobs they are neither qualified for nor deserve.

I would write a formal letter, perhaps even just start off with a phone call or email to your board secretary or the like.

Ed

www.engineerboards.com

RE: Non-PE Reference Dilemma

First thought, if you have reservations with making the recommendation on the individual, politely refuse altogether or if you do go ahead with the filling the recommendation, do it honestly.  It looks like the larger concern is with that of this registration/certification program.  For that you may want to get some input from your state licensing board.  With regards to offering engineering services to the public (if they do so), they may be operating right on the edge.  If there services are offered to companies, they might be considered outside the public arena.

Regards,

RE: Non-PE Reference Dilemma

Ron,

Anytime I'm asked to provide a reference and have some hesitations about the quality of the individual, or my amount of knowledge of that individual's talent, I try to be up front with the candidate and notify them that "I can do the reference, but it will be limited in its content...do you still want me to do it?"  If they still insist, I consider that I've been transparent with them and will simply fill out the form only to the level that I can.  In some cases, I've even written things like "no specific knowledge of their expenience in this area" and left it to the reviewers to consider.

As far as the concern over indirectly condoning a questionable organization by participating in their reference system, I think I'd first try to mentally separate my task of being a reference from the organization itself.   This is easier to do if the mis-behavior is minor or difficult to pin down.  

If the group was one that imported illegal drugs into the country, and the candidate was trying to get "licensed" to be a consultant to them, well of course I'd refuse.  

But when an organization only sometimes skirts the legality of engineering practice, and generally does not, perhaps I would...still keeping an eye on them as far as their ethics/legality.  Without knowing the extent to which they do illegally practice engineering, its hard to say.  

I guess there is a gray area here where a group's behavior might progressively get to a point where they become illegitimate, in your view, and you wish not to support them directly or indirectly.  

If you were to call your state engineering board, and ask them directly "Does this group, the XYZ Association, generally violate the state engineering laws" and the board said no, would you have any ethical reason not to participate?

RE: Non-PE Reference Dilemma

(OP)
JAE...to answer your bottom line question...NO.  I have some respected colleagues who have this "registration" and are practicing engineers and architects.  I guess my biggest concern is the "apparent equivalence" this organization seems to give to those who are not licensed professionals.

I believe I have separated my tasks as you suggested.  They just both happened to be at question and occurring at the same time!  I have had a conversation with the individual and have told him of my reservations.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources