×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Eccentricities in tension only diagonal x-bracing

Eccentricities in tension only diagonal x-bracing

Eccentricities in tension only diagonal x-bracing

(OP)
I am an EIT and I am designing some X-bracing to stabilize a relatively small platform.  I was using single angles back to back with a spacer plate to match the gusset plate thickness and using them as tension only.  Sounds easy enough...

I was looking closer at the gusset plate to angle connection and there are some eccentricities in that connection (from the centroid of the gusset plate to the centroid of the angle) that I think will transfer some bending moment into the angles.  I asked my very experienced mentor about it and he said he generally sizes the angles so the one leg welded or bolted to the gusset plate can resist the tensile force and he considers the other angle leg as a stiffner to the strap bracing (as he is effectively treating it as a strap).  This design method seems quite reasonable to me and the eccenricities become so small I think they are negligible.

Just to satisfy my curiousity, I looked at combined tension and bending on an angle versus the strap bracing method and I came up with using a slightly heavier angle with the combined loading.

My real question is, what do you look at when designing X-bracing using single angles?  Have you ever looked at the eccentricities?  I know there are design procedures to take the compressive strength of the other angle into account, does anyone use that procedure?

Thank you.

RE: Eccentricities in tension only diagonal x-bracing

I don't look at the eccentricities as they are fairly small.  I do most certainly use Chapter B of the AISC spec with the U value, though.  This takes into account the fact that ALL of the axial load is at first taken through the bolts which are only on the one leg (per your mentor) and then through a shear lag drifts out to the full section beyond the connection.

RE: Eccentricities in tension only diagonal x-bracing

(OP)
I too always use the U value when calculating the tensile rupture strength and understand it's purpose was to take into account eccentricities at connections (and I thought at connections only).  My thought was that there might be some yeilding near the connections due to combined bending and axial stresses, but not at the connections.  However, I didn't read the last paragraph of Chaper D Part 3, subparagraph 3 (in the 13th Ed.) that actually states:

Single angle, double angle, and WT sections shall have connections proportioned such that U is equal or greater than 0.60.  Alternatively, a lesser value of U is permitted if these tension members are designed for the effect of eccentricities in accordance with H1.2 or H2.

So I guess if I would have read more carefully I would have answered my own question...sorry about that.  I do thank you for your reply.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources