×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

chiller efficiency testing

chiller efficiency testing

chiller efficiency testing

(OP)
Has anyone done a chiller efficiency test. We are getting some weird numbers. Heat balance is supposed to be 5% or less. We are getting 30% to 40%. The machines are running well, tubes have been cleaned. They are carrier low pressure 540 ton. These are my readings I took at this moment:
ref temp: 41
chw sup temp: 44
ret chw temp: 56
cond ref temp: 97
cond wat temp out: 91
ent cond wat temp: 83
capacity: 101%
suction: -16
discharge:7

The main difference from design spec is the condenser delta T which was 14 but now reads around 7 to 8 psi most of the time. Could this be the prob?
We cut back on condenser water flow to it's design spec of 3.4 psi differential. It was at 6psi.
Any ideas?

RE: chiller efficiency testing

The cooler approach is good at 3*F
The chill water delta T is good at 12*F
You have a good condenser approach at 7*F
You have a good condenser Delta T at 8*F so I don't see a problem

RE: chiller efficiency testing

(OP)
Neither do I, but the program calls for a 5% heat balance. We tried running 3 condenser pumps for 2 machines today to achieve a 9 psi differential on the condenser water. This worked but it consumes more amperage to do this. The chiller amps did not go down and total amps to run the 2 machines with 3 pumps went up by 50 amps. Seems like a waste. We are being audited next week, can't wait.

RE: chiller efficiency testing

Please let us know what the results are. :>)

RE: chiller efficiency testing

Not, to be contradictive but, are you mixing terms? You start out by saying the condenser delta "T" was 14: "but now reads around 7 to 8 psi most of the time" do you mean 7 - 8 degrees" or was the 14 delta P  not sure. The 6 degree approach could be a bit high I know this sounds like a dumb question but did you verify that the condenser water is connected to the correct nozzles? The only reason I ask is the reduction is condenser flow from 6 delta P to 3.4 delta P should have caused the delta T to increase instead of drop. Something doesn't quit fit.

I'm not a real engineer, but I play one on T.V.
 A.J. Gest, York Int./JCI

RE: chiller efficiency testing

(OP)
It was a typo. The design delta P is 3.4 for the condenser. Once we started a second pump we got it to 9 psi. This got our heat balance to spec but it uses an extra 55 amps to do it. Chiller amps remained the same, so to me it's not worth it. The design specs also called for 85 degree water in, 99 out. We have never had these numbers. Maybe a 10 degree spread at best. The test I ran today came up with a 96% effeciency. With 1 cond pump running it went down below 80%. As far as I'm concerned it's just not worth the extra amperage to run a second pump.

RE: chiller efficiency testing

(OP)
Here's the test I did today:

CONDENSER    DESIGN    ACTUAL 1
TEMPERATURE IN    85.00     84.00
TEMPERATURE OUT    99.00     92.00
TEMPERATURE DIF    14.00     8.50
PRESSURE DIF    3.40     8.50
Gpm's         1100       1739
TONNAGE    646    615.99
PERCENT LOAD    100.00%    95.35%
EVAPORATOR    DESIGN    ACTUAL 1
TEMPERATURE IN    58.70     54.00
TEMPERATURE OUT    44.00     42.50
TEMP DIFF    14.70     11.50
PRESSURE DIFF    5.87     6.00
GALLONS PER MIN    1010    1021.12
TONNAGE    541.00     489.29
PERCENT LOAD    100.00%    90.44%
MOTOR    DESIGN    ACTUAL 1
VOLTAGE    L-1    460     475
VOLTAGE    L-2    460     474
VOLTAGE    L-3    460     474
AMPERES    L-1    512     470
AMPERES    L-2    512     471
AMPERES    L-3    512     467
AMPERAGE TOTAL    512     469
PERCENT LOAD    100.00%    91.67%
CHILLER    DESIGN    ACTUAL 1
AMPERES PER TON    0.9464     0.9592
KILOWATTS PER TON     0.6617     0.6916
CHILLER EFFICIENCY    100.00%    96.40%
% CHILLER INEFFICIENCY    0.00%    3.60%
HEAT BALANCE     DESIGN    ACTUAL 1
MOTOR TONS    101.672    96.10337053
HEAT BALANCE    -0.52%    -5.23%
        
        
CORRECTED DESIGN AMPS           512    496.528461
CORRECTED DESIGN AMPS/TON    0.9464     0.9178
ACTUAL AMPS PER TON                  0.9464     0.9592
DESIGN KW PER TON      0.6617     0.6617
ACTUAL KW PER TON    0.6617     0.6916
CORRECTED DESIGN DEVIATION %    0.00%    -0.75%
CORRECTED DESIGN KW/TON    0.6617     0.6667
DESIGN EFFICIENCY %    100.00%    96.40%
        
        
CONDENSER LOAD %    100.00%    95.35%
EVAPORATOR LOAD %    100.00%    90.44%
MOTOR LOAD %    100.00%    91.67%
DESIGN EFFICIENCY %    100.00%    96.40%
HEAT BALANCE %    -0.52%    -5.23%
        
        
POWER FACTOR CALCULATION    DESIGN    
MOTOR KW RATING    358    
POWER FACTOR %    0.8786     
        

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources