×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fatigue - Kt Factors for chem-milled steps

Fatigue - Kt Factors for chem-milled steps

Fatigue - Kt Factors for chem-milled steps

(OP)
Hi folks,

I am doing some durability (fatigue / DTA) analysis on a lower wing skin replacement mod. for a 25000+ lb ex military aircraft.

Basically the mod. involves replacing the original skin panel (which consisted of a skin, and an internal doubler and tripler fastened together with spotwelds - a corrosion nightmare) with a single piece skin of identical geometry as the original skin panel - i.e. the chem-milling is used to cut the profile and depth of the original doubler and tripler.

I have some decent fatigue data for un-notched chem-milled specimens (i.e. the specimens were chem-milled evenly on both sides)
However, I don't have any Kt notch data specifically for chem-milled steps (and my regulator won't accept Peterson's machined notch data).
Does anyone know were I could get Kt values for chem-milled steps?? I would appreciate input from anyone that has experience qualifying a chem-milled skin.

I use Nasgro and Afgrow for DTA. My approach to analyzing crack growth along the chem-milled step is pretty rudimentary:
1. I use the surface crack model and the thinnest gauge at the step.
2. I factor up the stress spectrum based on my assumed Kt factor (which as I mentioned above, my regulator has not bought into). I realize this is conservative as it applies the Kt to the entire thickness, so I will probably refine this to get a better life.

I would appreciate any input on how best to approach this problem, and how it is typically handled in the industry.

Thanks for your response.

RE: Fatigue - Kt Factors for chem-milled steps

I wouldn't buy it either.

A long time ago, my then employer tried electolytically assisted grinding of (hardened steel) axle shafts.  Productivity gains were amazing.

Unfortunately, the fatigue life went essentially to zero.  I.e., the part's life wasn't reduced by any computable factor; it just lost _all of its fatigue resistance.

How about some nice big vacuum chucks and CNC mills?





 


Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Fatigue - Kt Factors for chem-milled steps

MikeHalloran

I suspect the problem you had with the shaft was due to hydrogen embrittlement. Chemical etching or even EDM produces hydrogen that penetrate the metal and causes hydrogen embrittlement. This is detrimental for hardened parts (above 35-40RC). The etching is best done before heat treating.

As I understand SethMcKinley's skin is not hardened so it should be free of hydrogen embrittlement.

RE: Fatigue - Kt Factors for chem-milled steps

back to the OP ...
i think this is a significant improvement in the design.  I think there are enough process spec's out there to define a good procedure (but that'll be for the M&P to do).  

i'd be a little hesitant about trying to define a Kt for the step, 'cause there's a bunch of other structure around the step that's helping.  Rooke and Cartwright have a SIF solution for a crack approaching a step.

I'd suggest a simpler approach.
For long crack lengths (cracks wider than the step) lump the step area as a central stiffener (easy SIF solution) and you're left with a single thickness sheet.
For residaul strength, I'd neglect the step area completely ... in my experience integral pads aren't very effective (bonded/rivetted straps are very effective).  I'd model the stringer and a constant thickness sheet.
For very short cracks (like at a rivet hole in the step) I'd apply the constant skin thickness stress (ie, assume the pad is ineffective in reducing the stress), and I'd only consider the pad thickness if I was growing a part thru thickness flaw.  This comment applies to pads that are across the principal stress direction (like rib or frame pads); stringer pads (aligned to the principal stress) are effective.

any help ?

good luck

RE: Fatigue - Kt Factors for chem-milled steps

Food for thought,

It would seem to me that you would be more critical at the fastener location due to load transfer(which I'm assuming is in the pad).  For example, the skin connected to the spar will transfer your shear.  This should have a higher Kt than the chem mill step.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources