×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Large Check Valves

Large Check Valves

Large Check Valves

(OP)
We had a 30" wafer check valve fail. After 2 weeks of downtime, we finally found the remains of the flapper and are operational again. To avoid this fun, we are replacing all the valves of the same style. Unfortunately, the 30" and 36" replacements will be too wide, and will require cutting the pipe.

Does anybody know of a company that can custom make 2 wafer check valves of this size? I have some calls out, but so far there are no replies.

RE: Large Check Valves

Used to be a company named Wheatly that made the best "BigInch" checks.  Don't know if they're still around.  I haven't been in the States in a long time.

RE: Large Check Valves

I put "wafer-check" into Google and got 41000 hits.  SOMEBODY will make you so large valves.  

RE: Large Check Valves

(OP)
Funny you should mention Wheatley, because they were the original manufacturers of the wafer checks. They have since updated their design, and made them thicker so they will no longer fit in the alloted space and require us to cut the pipe.

This will likely be a custom job, so if anyone knows of a company that does work like this, please let me know.

RE: Large Check Valves

Not sooooo funny.  The best are the best and back then there wern't so many acceptable mfgrs to choose from.  I suspect, that if you want a good heavy duty full swing check, there still arn't too many to choose from.  I haven't speced any large checks for awhile now.

I presume these are flanged, since if they were weld ends you would have to cut and rebevel the pipe anyway and you might be able to fit them easier.  Or maybe there's a bypass around them or something.  Any reason you can't cut in a new valve?  Or better yet, any reason you can't repair the old ones?  Dumb question after they just caused you 2 wks down time I guess.

If they are guided and heavy disk for pig travel, don't try to replace them with a silly wafer check.  The pigs will take them out of action at first bang.

http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com
(A work in progress)

RE: Large Check Valves

Oh sorry, I see you did say "wafer" check.  But you know, I think you really did mean to say "swing check", right?

RE: Large Check Valves

Suggest you lookm at why the check valves failed. Likely cause is waterhammer. see www.pipingdesign.com.

Noreva make short pattern non slam check valves www.noreva.de. This may solve your space problem and also stop the check valve failures and reduce maintenance on other equipment.

Geoffrey D Stone FIMechE C.Eng;FIEust CP Eng
www.waterhammer.bigblog.com.au

RE: Large Check Valves

(OP)
We always could cut in a new valve, but then we would have to buy and install a spool piece, weld on flanges to the exiting line, and have all the welds x-rayed and pressure tested. If we could find someone who could make a valve of the same dimensions as the ones we are replacing, it would be more expensive than an off-the-shelf part, but overall cheaper and easier.

And as for the type, everyone here has been calling it a wafer check, and with the 36" one just 4 1/16" thick, they definately aren't full body.

They are used in a natural gas environment, so water hammer isn't a factor. The reason it failed is because the flapper plate (as we have come to call it) was attached to the pivoting bar by 4 bolts. For whatever reason, the bolts weren't welded, lock washered or even loctited in place, so they backed out over the last 7 years. Once one on the end wiggled itself out, the two in the middle sheared at the interface, and the last one bolt put up a good fight before failing.

The new design from Wheatley has a one-piece internal assembly. While this undoubtedly makes for a more reliable valve, it is thicker than the original and this proposes a problem.

Repairing was considered, but since the only logical explanation for this check valve is backup protection for an expander, we opted to replace it in the line without the flapper in order to start up the plant sooner. At the moment it is an orifice plate. At the turnaround this fall we are going to replace it with a functional wafer check, whether we have to cut the pipe or not.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources