×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

LRFD Foundation Design

LRFD Foundation Design

LRFD Foundation Design

(OP)
I am designing a bldg according to IBC 2006.  I have designed everything up to the foundation using LRFD.  Now I am at the foundation, and Section 1804 only allows ASD to check the soil capacity.  Is this right?  Any ideas how I can move forward besides doing a separate ASD analysis just for the foundation?  If I get a soils investigation and it tells me allowable soil bearing capacity, where can I get factors for soil bearing, sliding, etc?  (Please ignore the fact that I do not already have a subsurface investigation.  I am working on it.)

RE: LRFD Foundation Design

We use LRFD, but then use ASD for the foundations.  Always have.

 

RE: LRFD Foundation Design

If the building code says you have to use ASD, then you don't have an option.  As JAE stated, we normally use ASD for foundations regardless of the design method used for the superstructure.  I would go back and find your service loads for your foundations.  

Just fyi, I've done retaining wall designs using LRFD using AASHTO LRFD and DOT specs.  You need the code in order to have permission to use LRFD and also to get your resistance factors.  You then need the geotechical engineer to provide you with nominal capacities instead of allowable.  There's a lot that goes into determining appropriate LRFD factors for use with foundations.

RE: LRFD Foundation Design

LRFD, what a PITA!

RE: LRFD Foundation Design

(OP)
Thank you all for your responses.

RE: LRFD Foundation Design

I generally take the loads down separating the dead load and the live load... then it's just a matter of dividing by the respective load factor... else you can conservatively use a value of 1.3 or whatever.  Generally, foundation costs are pretty insensitive to a tight or loose design...

Dik

RE: LRFD Foundation Design

syuen,
if you (are compelled to)design  according to ASD, then I believe you should not worry about safety factors beyond the global factor which is customarily used (usually = 3).
Your allowable soil bearing capacity is treated as if it were the soil resistance according to LRFD.
I'll add that, ideally, the two will often converge, but LRFD design is governed by data variability and uncertainty as well, whereas ASD is not, being a more crude estimate, since soil is an inherently dishomogeneous system. In situations where you have a sufficiently numerous data set, and data are not too scattered nor too clustered, ASD and LRFD should not result in widely different results. LRFD just yields a value which should ensure that probability of failure is kept within reasonable (very low) limits.
Weird enough that IBC denies its application to foundation design, since one of the main targets of LRFD is full integration between upper structure and foundation design, structurals and geotechs.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources