A Heat Pump a good choice?
A Heat Pump a good choice?
(OP)
I'm in the Detroit area and considering a heat pump as suplimental heat.
The gov rates the heat pump I'm looking at at 8.5 HSPF with the AC side at 13 SEER. The point at which the system switches from heat pump to gas is 38 deg. outside temp.
The cost of electricity is about $.09/kw. The price of gas is $1.33/ccf. The furnace is a 94.5% effecient furnace dual stage 30/60k btu output. The heat pump would be a 3 ton unit.
The house is usually 72 deg. during the day and 65 deg at night.
The added cost would be $600 plus added maintanence that comes with the heat pump.
Is there a way to calculate the efficiency of the heat pump at 38 deg given the above parameters? Is there a spread sheet or some other program out there that I can plug in average daily temps for a region that would give a comparitive analysis?
Thanks,
Brian
The gov rates the heat pump I'm looking at at 8.5 HSPF with the AC side at 13 SEER. The point at which the system switches from heat pump to gas is 38 deg. outside temp.
The cost of electricity is about $.09/kw. The price of gas is $1.33/ccf. The furnace is a 94.5% effecient furnace dual stage 30/60k btu output. The heat pump would be a 3 ton unit.
The house is usually 72 deg. during the day and 65 deg at night.
The added cost would be $600 plus added maintanence that comes with the heat pump.
Is there a way to calculate the efficiency of the heat pump at 38 deg given the above parameters? Is there a spread sheet or some other program out there that I can plug in average daily temps for a region that would give a comparitive analysis?
Thanks,
Brian





RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
1.So I ask to the Forum about the so-called solar heat-pumps I mean those which has the condensing module in form of black metalic surfaces in the role of solar pannels. My main doubts is that this device is trying to pretend to be a solar system, but it is mainly a heat pump.
2.That condensing module is depending greatly on the outside air hygrometic conditions, and that's all! You could have placed that module inside of the garage.
3. So when we calculate a solar system, we should simulate its performance all around-year as well. I wonder (because I ask before and I didn't receive any consistent reply so far from any manufacturer) which is the COP (or the SEER) profiles all-around year, I mean how much electric energy I have to spend every month during one year?
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/BLDG/pubs/hspf/
Although it doesn't specifically answer my question, it does shed some light on HSPF. Apparently HSPF is based on climate zone IV. As you go to colder climes, the actual HSPF drops. Conversely going to warmer areas the actual HSPF increases.
It still doesn't really tell me if investing the additional $600 is going to pay off in X number of years.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
In thread403-158370 I posted a link to a calculator.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
As the delta-t between inside and outside temps increases, the cycle efficiency decreases dramatically, at 38F with the unit proposed.
I'll bet there's a lot of days in Detroit below 38F in winter.......
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Detroit has about 3 months where A/C is really nice to have. About 3 months where A/C and heat aren't required. About 3 months where a heat pump could certainly be used and about 3 months where gas would be the primary heat source.
Of course during the 3 months where a heat pump would be quite viable, the heating cost is not that high. It is during the 3 months where the average temp is less than 30 that the heating bill is the biggest.
So the question is whether or not operating a heat pump for three months out of the year instead of natural gas going to pay for the additional cost of installing the heat pump.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
I'm not a real engineer, but I play one on T.V.
A.J. Gest, York Int./JCI
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
We used to pay around USD 8000/year for heating (big house, middle Sweden). After installing three air/air inverter technology heat pumps, we reduced total heating cost to USD 3500. We have had a quite cold winter with between -15 and -20 C for a couple of monts. The heat pumps worked well down to -15 C, but we had to burn oil when it was colder. In spite of that, we reduced heating cost with more than 50 percent. We are very happy with the heat pumps.
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Where I live (6000-6500 heating degree days/yr), the delta-t is frequently greater than 70 deg F in winter and I consider that air-to-air heat pumps are not economical with a delta t much above 30F.
Remember that the maximum efficiency of a Carnot cycle is in the 30% range with low delta t.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
"And what did you replace with the heat pumps in Sweeden?": A furnace with a measured efficiency (Eta) = 93.8 percent.
The total cost for the tree heat-pumps was around 4000 USD, including installation. The pay-back time is less than a year.
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Can you show us, how do you arrive at a "pay-back time is less than a year". Specifically, how is the SEER profile all the year-around ?
welch
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Sorry, I'm having a hard time figuring out US$1500 for 1 m3.
Cubic meter of what? 1500? One-thousand, five-hundered?
The original poster's cost for gas is about US$0.40/cubic meter.
I know you guys have higher energy prices, but 5 orders of magnitude?
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
It appears to be fuel oil from his post. North American oil burning appliances can't get to the condensing range that European units can, due to the high sulfur content in our oil supplies.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
I wonder how the (COP) SEER varies all along the year and all along the day tipically?
When you state: "We had less than half the total cost with the heat pumps". That could be understood as a figure of SEER bigger than 2. Is it?. If you payed 4000 USD for your heat pumps, then I suppose the energy consumption reached well above 8000 USD or something between 5000 and 6000 liters in a year, before the heat pumps. Is this corrected ?
A basic question: can somebody define SEER?
Thanks.
Welch
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
see wikipedia for the basics
h
see this artical for a little better understanding of really what SEER is
http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/BLDG/pubs/hspf/
SEER is not COP. It is very losely realated, but that is all.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Your question: 'When you state: "We had less than half the total cost with the heat pumps". That could be understood as a figure of SEER bigger than 2. Is it?. If you payed 4000 USD for your heat pumps, then I suppose the energy consumption reached well above 8000 USD or something between 5000 and 6000 liters in a year, before the heat pumps. Is this corrected ?'
Yes. That is correct. We used close to 6000 litres the year before we installed the heat pumps. And, yes. We saved more than 50 percent on energy costs after having installed them. And that energy cost includes all fuel and electric cost - not only what we need for heating. So I guess that we save a lot more than 50 percent on the heating alone. It is a large house - 360 m2 plus an attic with 180 m2 floor area. We do not use the attic. It is just a storage space and also an extra "insulation layer".
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Anyways.... on the out side it makes the claim....
"The worlds first 30 EER and 20 COP heat pump". I was asking my Boss... and he said 30 EER is like 20 - 22 SEER
I know water to air units are more efficient. And I have yet to hear of a typical air/air heat pump at 20 SEER. ( I have heard 19) but yes 185 ft down/ton for a well and a 3 or 4 ton system does get pricey. Not to mention new units start around 10,000 Dollars installed. ( approx 2 ton system)
Bubz
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
www.retscreen.net
For newbies, this is a great place to start.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Take the "V" out of HVAC and you are left with a HAC(k) job.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
The cost of electricity is about $.09/kw. The price of gas is $1.33/ccf. The furnace is a 94.5% effecient furnace dual stage 30/60k btu output. The heat pump would be a 3 ton unit.
The house is usually 72 deg. during the day and 65 deg at night.
-----------
From data I have seen, you can expect a COP between 2 and 3. Taking 2.5, the cost of heating with the heat pump alone would be $.09/(3.413*2.5)=$.01/1000BTU.
For your fuel @ 94.5% efficiency, I get
1.33/100=.0133. So the difference is
$.0033 per 1000BTU. Now you have to get an estimate of the amount of heating you need above 38 deg in the Detroit area
I got some data for Detroit and came up with 2455 degree days during which you could use your heatpump Oct,Nov, few days in Dec,Mar,April,May. Now I also have data that has the annual number of heating deg days of 6442. I would take my annual heating bill and divide by cost of fuel (and efficiency) last year to get the number of therms used(100000 BTUs). For example if your heating bill was $3000 and gas was $1.33/therm, then x=$3000/$1.33/.945=2386 therms. The amount of this that could be used for heat pump would be in proportion to the heat pump usage or
2455/6442*2386=909 therms. For each therm, according to my earlier forecast of $.008/1000 would be $0.80/therm and the potentialannual savings$.8*909=$720 for my case.
RE: A Heat Pump a good choice?
Cost of gas heating should have been $.01407 to include efficiency. So the savings/therm should have been .00407 and the overall annual savings for the case I chose
$.407*909=$369
still, not bad.