×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

RAM Advanse

RAM Advanse

RAM Advanse

(OP)
I am planning to buy a structural analysis package and I am considering RAM Advanse. Comments from current experienced users would be appreciated.
IV

RE: RAM Advanse

Have had RAM Advanse and RAM Structural System for 5 years.  Thumbs up for both.  Recommend you go with the tutorial and evaluation copy both of which are offered free of charge prior to sale.  I also still use STAAD.  STAAD is becoming more user friendly and is still a good piece of software.  RAM offers better customer service.  Other thoughts about strutural software, try and get a sense of what they plan to do in the future.  Will the software be part of the BIM trend?  There are differing philosophies on how a particular piece of software will be a part of this coming integration of design.

RE: RAM Advanse

I have tried the evaluation copy of Ram Advanse and have been through a web tutorial with one of the RAM representatives. The spreadsheet based input was not as friendly as the graphical input of STAAD. If you are not looking for integration with Ram Structural Systems or other RAM products, I would opt for STAAD. STAAD is powerful and has a longer learning curve, but once you are comfortable with the parts applicable to your discipline (bridges, buildings, etc.), it's comfortable.

I do have to agree with SperlingPE that RAM offers better customer service than STAAD. Also, the STAAD manuals are typically of little help. The examples show some practical use, but overall the printed material is a disappointment.

RE: RAM Advanse

Have using a few programs here is my thoughts.

STAAD is great, but to me the hardest to learn and utilize.  It is very powerful, but not as user friendly.  In my opinion, STAAD is best learned from people that use it everyday, and not through tutorials or manuals.   

RISA is probably the easiest to use, and would recommend it if you did not want to do very complex structures, or did not want to integrate it as RAM Advanse.

RAM Advanse I feel is in the middle; it is more user friendly than STAAD, but not as much as RISA.  That said it is pretty easy to maneuver and get good numbers.  RAM customer service is by far the best I have seen out of any programs I have used.  It is also good because it can integrate with Structural Systems (which I really like).

So, for a simple stand alone program I would use RISA, but if you want to integrate it later with a bigger system and need good customer service to help you figure out the programs I would use RAM Advanse.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources