Associative Basic Curves
Associative Basic Curves
(OP)
Does anyone use Associative Basic Curves function in their design?
I’m Curious
You can use the Survey
First Try
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=461432309741
I’m Curious
You can use the Survey
First Try
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=461432309741





RE: Associative Basic Curves
Item 2: Note that Associative Basic Curves is not and will never be intended as a replacement for Sketching, and for several reasons. To start with, Associative Basic Curves are just that Associative, they are NOT constrained except in a limited sense. Granted, in cases where people were using a Sketch so they could create one or two simple curves linked to some existing modeling features, Associative Basic Curves would be the preferred approach to take today, but we hope that NO ONE starts to create profiles of 10 or 15 Associative Basic Curves strung together and then used in an extrude or revolve so as to avoid creating a "Sketch". That would be "software abuse".
Item 3: There is no need to put a place holder in there labled NX 5+ as it will be at least until next March (if we keep to our planned schedule) before NX 5 will be a released product. After all, it won't even go into Beta until this September/October.
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product "Evangelist"
NX Product Line
UGS Corp
Cypress, CA
Phone: 714-952-6032
FAX: 714-952-5758
John.R.Baker@ugs.com
RE: Associative Basic Curves
We find it also very helpfull in reverse engineering situations. As they are parametrised, they can be used to shape and adjust a freeform surface based on 3D measurement points.
To us it's one of the major improvements from NX3 on.
RE: Associative Basic Curves
Since we have gone to NX3 we have not been developing new product, so I have not been able to make use of it. That’s why the curiosity of how people are using it. I am not against it, I am one of the ones who have requested Associative Basic Curves for the same reason you have described… When you want to do something simple or when you want to constrain curves on multiple planes like for some routing project. The reason that I put sketch in the survey was to see if users that did not use Associative Basic Curves also would not use Sketch either.
The reason I have nx5 as a choice is because this survey is not for any official reason, and I could neglect to look at it or remove it for a year or some ugs guy could be using a beta version or something.
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=461432309741
RE: Associative Basic Curves
Visible: 15
Summary and Detail
Associative Basic Curves
1. Do you use Associative Basic Curves function?
Response Percent Response Total
I frequently use it
20% 3
I have used it a few times
40% 6
No, don’t need it
26.7% 4
I’m not sure what it is
13.3% 2
Total Respondents 15
(skipped this question) 0
2. Do you like the Associative Basic Curves function?
Response Percent Response Total
Yes, It’s perfect for my situation
14.3% 2
Yes, but needs improvements
21.4% 3
I would like to try it
14.3% 2
No, I do use Sketcher
35.7% 5
No
14.3% 2
Total Respondents 14
(skipped this question) 1
3. What version of UG/NX do you use?
Response Percent Response Total
NX2 (UG) or older
7.1% 1
NX3
64.3% 9
NX4
28.6% 4
NX5+
0% 0
Total Respondents 14
(skipped this question) 1
4. Please comment
Total Respondents
1
(skipped this question) 14
1.
i used to use catia and being able to work on a 2D plane was a big advantage compared to NX
RE: Associative Basic Curves
Tim Flater
Senior Designer
Enkei America, Inc.
www.enkei.com
RE: Associative Basic Curves
RE: Associative Basic Curves
a lot of times in surveys I saw comments made by experienced users in other(s) systems but very unexperienced in the surveyed system: imho, it's an error and a bad-taste habit...
Regards
RE: Associative Basic Curves
Rather, I should say it's difficult to get a genuine, non-biased result.
Tim Flater
Senior Designer
Enkei America, Inc.
www.enkei.com
RE: Associative Basic Curves
When it came to trying to provide some of the capabilities of the "2D Construction Plane", what we did was add the options that you will find if while in Modeling you go to Preferences/Work Plane... and when the "Grid" dialog comes up, select the "Display" tab and chose either the second or third option under "Objects Off Work Plane".
While I don't use this function all that much, a number of the people who have moved from Catia to UG/NX seem to appreciate how this allows them to work.
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product "Evangelist"
NX Product Line
UGS Corp
Cypress, CA
Phone: 714-952-6032
FAX: 714-952-5758
John.R.Baker@ugs.com
RE: Associative Basic Curves
I can see why some would like to use it in modeling.
RE: Associative Basic Curves
Also, what is an "Assoiative Basic Curve"? In NX, basic curves (created using the Basic Curve tool) have no associativity. Are you talking about 3D curves created with Insert -> Curves -> Lines and Arcs? If not, I'd be very interested in how to create a Basic Curve that has associativity.
RE: Associative Basic Curves
I am former UG user who is now working in Catia V5. At my former employer I had upgraded to NX3 just as I was leaving. From what I remember "associative curves" was new to NX3, and was accessible through the "lines and arcs" toolbar. I believe there was an associative toggle button. In any case it should show up under "what's new" in the documents.
regards, thixoguy
RE: Associative Basic Curves
Thanks
Fred Brender
RE: Associative Basic Curves
misunderstanding in terms usage is what we've got here.
fgbender you're right,
"assoiative basic curves" are "3D curves" created thru "insert -> curves -> lines and arcs".
basic curves created using "insert -> curves -> basic curves..." have no associativity, as you mentioned above.
it's a little bit confusing maybe, when you concentrate on the terms.
_____________________________________
"Complex problems have simple, easy-to-understand, wrong answers."
_________________
PI Penkov
CAM Programmer
Non-standard Equipment Designer
RE: Associative Basic Curves
I'm not all that up to speed with 'Associative Basic Curves' (ABC) but I do use them on occassion in a very limited sense. As John Baker stated earlier, they are not meant to be (nor should be) used as a replacement for sketched curves, but they do have their uses. Sketched curves can be fully constrained both geometrically and dimensionally, while ABC have a very limited sense of associativity.
Perhaps a simple example may help clarify... Say for example you have 2 entities (separate sketches, bodies, surfaces, associative points, whatever...) and you need to create a line between between the two to create a ruled surface (or extrusion or whatever...). You can add an ABC between two entities and the ABC curve will maintain the associativity between the two entities (the endpoints of the ABC line will maintain the geometric constraint of 'endpoint', assumming that was the associativity created). This means that if either of the two original entities move or otherwise change position, the ABC will move along with it.
Clear as mud? Remember, there is a difference between an ABC and a regular old curve from the days of old. They are in effect, 2 different animals and should be treated as such. If a sketch curve was a horse, and a 2d curve was a donkey, then an ABC would be an ass (or donkey if you prefer).
Hope this helps...
Regards,
SS
CAD should pay for itself, shouldn't it?
RE: Associative Basic Curves
RE: Associative Basic Curves
Regards,
SS
CAD should pay for itself, shouldn't it?
RE: Associative Basic Curves
As for the "Associative Basic Curves", sorry for the confusion, but this was intended to be a replacement for the old "Basic Curves" function, which while we are not removing them from the system, we will be making them harder and harder to find.
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product "Evangelist"
NX Product Line
UGS Corp
Cypress, CA
Phone: 714-952-6032
FAX: 714-952-5758
John.R.Baker@ugs.com
RE: Associative Basic Curves
Thanks for the clarification. I was only trying to make the point that NX has and always has had the ability to work on a 2D plane.
As for the basic curves thing, I'm well aware that the old "Basic Curves" funtionality is getting harder to find. I wish that were not the case because there are times when a good old-fashioned, non-associative, point to point curves is all that is needed and it is much simpler to create than the new curves.
Thanks for the comments.
Shadowspawn,
Thanks for the comments. I am a big proponent of sketcher and would never advocate using constrained curves as a replacement for it. But since sketcher is 2D, there are times when a constrained 3D curve comes in handy. I am well aware of the new associative curve functionality. Based on the thread, I thought maybe there was a way to constrain curves created with the old basic curve tool. I am clear on it now.
Thanks
RE: Associative Basic Curves
As for not creating them "associative", just because they're called "Associative Basic Curves" does not mean that we have not provided an option to create them non-associative. Now you have only one inteface to learn for BOTH Associative and Non-Associative "Basic Curves", which is what we want new users to experience. Also, with respect to your comment about making a "good old-fashioned, non-associative, point to point curve", have you tried creating lines and arcs using the "Lines and Arcs Toolbar" rather then Insert/Curve/Line... or Arc/Circle... ? I think you will find that for quick & simple tasks, it's pretty hard to beat in terms of keystrokes and feedback. Besides, when it comes time to edit one of these "basic curves", you may realize that they being associative can pay some big premiums.
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product "Evangelist"
NX Product Line
UGS Corp
Cypress, CA
Phone: 714-952-6032
FAX: 714-952-5758
John.R.Baker@ugs.com
RE: Associative Basic Curves
It is possible, in a limited sence, to have 3D sketch curves utilizing associative points with splines connecting the points. The points are driven by a spreadsheet and the splines utilize the points as knot points, which are used to create sheets (which are then sewn together for the solid). As long as the spreadsheet data is set up correctly, modifying the files are relatively simple.
The company I used to work for utilized this approach to develop impellor blades, and I'm using this approach to develop die models to forge turbine blades. My biggest headache is getting the point values into a spreadsheet, given the various data inputs from the customers (iges files, parasolids, 2D curves, point data, etc...).
I sometimes think anything is possible with this software...
Regards,
SS
CAD should pay for itself, shouldn't it?
RE: Associative Basic Curves
this debate about associative basic curves brings up a lot of interesting issues! I therefore also give my point of view:
I'm a NX (ex UG) user for 6 years now, and I am, as fgbrender, a big proponent of the sketcher, however, since ABC appeared in NX3, I also found them very helpful for 3D curves (eg: I design sailing boats for my company, and ABC are very appropriate for doing rigging cables).
Shadowspawn, I'm very interested by what you say about 3D sketch curves (particularly splines), but I can't really figure out how you do them. would you, by any chance, accept to send me an example part
regards.
RE: Associative Basic Curves
I just used ABC. I needed to calculate and adjust spacing for an Instance feature. I cut a section through a freeform face then cut Parallel Planes along the curve. Now I have points that I can put parametric curves on witch gives me an Instance distance and vector for each feature. Now all we need is a truly parametric vector for Instance.
Csbk