×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

(OP)
Well, it looks like my original question from thread108-64541 has been answered; An Audi R10 car with a V12 5.5L turbo diesel convincingly won the 2006 Le Mans 24 hour race:

http://www.lemans.org/24heuresdumans/live/pages/chronos_gb.html

The second team car had a number of problems, and came in third.  Now the question is: how many other racing classes will diesels be competitive in?  I note that PSA are preparing a V12 diesel to compete with the Audi, and now JCB are preparing a diesel world land speed record car using their 4.4L industrial diesel engine!

PJGD

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

You should be aware that the rules were modified to favour diesels.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

If I remember rightly it's all down to the amount of fuel energy you are allowed to carry around with you.  And the relative densities and calorific values are biased towards diesels.

I must admit I've always found mixed-rules racing a little difficult to take seriously.  The rule makers try to jiggle with details in the rules to level the playing field, but there's always one clear best package.  Take the dominance of Ducati in the 90s WSB.  They had a bigger engine and less weight.  And the two strokes in MotoGP when engines had to be the same size (500cc).

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans


Special rules are just as often made for marketing, smog, and popularity as they are to level the playing field.

2-strokes really got hammered for marketing and smog. They have to race against 4's nearly twice their size.

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

"They have to race against 4's nearly twice their size."

These days yes, in the 80'2/90's no.  And that reinforces my point (and Greg's).  In a mixed field the winners are determined by the rules.  Remember the oval piston "v8" NR500 that Honda made to try to get even with the strokers?

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

(OP)
Surely it is a case that the rules have changed to favour fuel efficiency, which is (or should be) an issue of abiding interest to society as a whole, including motor sports.  It just so happens that the ascendancy of the diesel engine is for obvious reasons coinciding with this interest.  I don't believe that the rules were changed to specifically favour the diesel cars per se.

I am not familiar with the specifics of the rule change, but any views on how significant it was to this race?  Who would have won if the rules had not been changed, and by how much?

PJGD

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

"fuel efficiency"

These cars are going around in circles!  Their efficiency in real-world terms is zero.

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

I don't believe that the rules were changed to specifically favour the diesel cars per se.

I don't know what the rules are now or what they were in the past, but a quick look at the website gave me this file.

http://www.lemans.org/sport/sport/reglements/ressources/auto_2006/Regl_2006_prototype_ACO_fr_gb.pdf

Just glancing at a couple of sections (and maybe taking them out of context) gives me the impression you could race say (examples)

a 4 litre gasoline engine with more than two valves per cylinder and about 1/2 an atmosphere of boost,
 
or

a 5 1/2 litre diesel engine with nearly 2 atmospheres of boost.

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

Expanding on my earlier point...

The rules also state that the fuel tank must be no more than 90l in size, regardless of what's in it.  Gasoline and diesel have similar lower heats of combustion based on mass (within 1%), but diesel is about 11% denser.  So a full tank of diesel contains slightly more than 10% more energy than a full tank of gasoline.  That's a bit of a head start in endurance racing - at least 10% less pit stops.

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

(OP)
OK, on the face of it, the new rules would appear to favour a diesel engine but how do you arrive at a fair equivalence formula, if that is an objective?  In an SI world, it is horsepower that wins races, hence the inordinate focus on that parameter.  In this case, the rules seem to have arrived at a near equivalency on horsepower since both the Judd and the Audi claim somewhere around 630 HP, and I believe that the Judd is naturally aspirated, so not taking advantage of the boost regulation.  

The Judd has a rated speed of about 8K vs 5K rev/min for the Audi.

As for fuel efficiency, well yes, the Judd had to make 29 fueling stops as against 25 for the winning Audi.  Obviously, the fewer the stops, the better.

PJGD

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

If they allow larger diesel engines with more boost to make the HP equivalent to gasoline engines, then they should shrink the size of the gas tanks on the diesel cars to force them to have the same number of pit stops as the gasoline cars.  Why equalize one parameter if you're going to leave another very important parameter with a huge disparity?

Another rule exception the Audis got was that they were allowed a larger diameter restrictor (38mm for diesel vs 33 for gasoline) on their fuel filling rig because diesel flows slower than gasoline, and the ACO didn't think they should have slower pit stops than everyone else just because they're using a different fuel.

Granted, this is the first year for a diesel endurance racer so the ACO can't be expected to have the rules perfect yet to equalize the competition, but it certainly seems like they tried to give plenty of help to diesels to make up for their shortfalls, but didn't give them any restrictions to lessen their natural advantages.  

Bob

RE: A Diesel Wins at Le Mans

(OP)
What is the issue with multiple sets of rules (other than in the short term)?  Is it not the case that where there are multiple rule sets, the competitors will migrate to the rules that consistently deliver the winner, so that it quickly becomes in effect a single set?  In this way the organizers leave the door open for the sort of innovation that you would not get if it were a single set from the start.

PJGD

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources