×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Reduced bore and full bore ball valve

Reduced bore and full bore ball valve

Reduced bore and full bore ball valve

(OP)
I found two type of one side down (18"x16")and two size down (eg 18"x14") for reduced bore size for ball valve. What is the consequence in views of velocity, flow, etc. between two size down and one size down. What is the interanal diameter difference between them?

RE: Reduced bore and full bore ball valve

A client recently asked me to price a 10-inch full port and reduced port valve for an application and was amazed to find that for that day the full port was less expensive.  The only reasonable justification that I've ever heard for using reduced port valves is cost savings.  Today those cost savings seem to be slim to none.

From a fluid mechanics viewpoint, the beta ratios are 0.88 and 0.78 respectively.  API 14.3 has formulas for calculating permanant pressure drop across a restriction and using those beta ratios you get a number vanishinly close to zero permanant pressure drop.  From a fluid mechanics viewpoint either one will give you about the same results as a full-port valve (within the accuracy of any calculations you can do on it).

From a mechanical-perations viepoint there is a huge difference.  I saw a presentation once by the head of Tenneco pipeline group and he showed a 36-inch valve at the start of the line going under the river into Manhattan.  He said that they pig that line weekly and it takes the pig between 2-5 hours to traverse each of the reduced port valves and he is often very concerned that pressures on the island will drop to dangerous levels before the pig clears the second reduced port valve.  The big EPNG explosion in New Mexico a few years ago was due to corrosion that hadn't been identified because the line had to be exempted from their smart-pigging schedule because of the reduced-port ball valves every 5 miles.

I never buy reduced-port valves larger than 2-inch.  I always specify full-port trunnion ball valves for anything bigger than 3 inch, any size valve on lines with less than 15 psi normal operating pressure (except drilled tank valves), or any size valve on a line with a normal operating pressure more than 300 psi.  I've never had occasion to regret that decision.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

The harder I work, the luckier I seem

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources