×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

(OP)
I noticed the 6th edition of Donald E. Breyer's Design of Wood Structures has ASD/LRFD.

In practice is ASD still being used? Or are designers heading towards LRFD?

I have the 3rd edition of Donale E. Breyer's Design of Wood Structures and was interested in reviewing it again for my personal knowledge and to get more experience in wood design.

Should I be alright by looking at this ASD book (3rd edition) or should I consider looking into LRFD desig?

THANKS



RE: Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

The latest edition of NDS (2005) covers both ASD & LRFD. Since that is the code that sets the standard in the US for wood design, looks like the move is on towards LRFD in the future.
http://www.awc.org/Standards/nds.html

IMHO, Breyer offers the best books on wood (any edition). Oddly enought, the most important change in recent years has nothing to do with either ASD or LRFD. Allowable shear in lumber almost doubled from NDS 1997 to NSD 2001 - there was a decades long mistake in how shear was accounted for. Here is a summary and explanation
http://www.awc.org/Publications/papers/NDS2001article.pdf

If you use an older reference, be sure to keep this in mind.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea

RE: Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

I still use ADS.  My understanding is that there is very little advantage in using LRFD.

I have years of experience using ASD which I can relate to.  Since the 1991 NDS there have been a lot of changes.  I am very skeptical of some of the changes which were made.

For example with the design equations for bolts, you plug in a lot of numbers and get an answer.  However when you get an answer you have no feel for its accuracey.  I find my self comparing it to the design value under the 86 NDS.

With newer research on wood connections and further changes in the NDS, I find my skeptcism of the 91 NDS increasing.

From people I've talked to, if I sat down and worked my way through LRFD, I would probably start using it.  

RE: Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

I use ASD.  I think LRFD makes more sense for a material like steel, where something like an adequately braced beam fails by the formation of a platic hinge, or for concrete.  I am not familiar with LRFD for wood, but am skeptical that it would add anything other than increased complexity.  With that said, I'm sure the academic community will embrace it and try to shove it down everyones throat.  If I'm wrong I'll have a nice helping of humble pie.

RE: Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

I still use ASD in my day to day work.  I have designed using LFD and LRFD.  I think, for example, LFD of concrete structures is fine.  I also thing LFD design of steel can be fine, but you should still perform the servicability checks.

This is one of my greatest concerns with LRFD.  The community is telling me that you no longer have to check deflections and stuff like that.  I say BULL!  If I'm getting 12 inches of deflection in a 30 ft member, I'm going to increase the MOI, period.

In wood, I'd accept some sort of LFD design theory so that a larger Factor of Safety could be applied against live load, but it is still a basic solids of mechanics type material, so I'm going to treat it that way.

RE: Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

Dinosaur, if deflections aren't being checked with LRFD that sounds like a recipe for disaster.  In my experience deflections often control for steel and for longer engineered lumber like LVL.  I'm just skeptical the LRFD will provide a tangible benefit for the design of wood structures, and that it's mostly something the academics will like.  If they take the same approach that AISC did in having a unified spec, that could be ok.  

You could still use higher FOS for live load with ASD if you want to.  I do it all the time.

RE: Design of Wood Structures ASD/LRFD - Donald E. Breyer

I just purchased the NDS 2005 which is a combined ASD/LRFD document similar to the AISC approach.  The document is clear and concise and phi factors are added to the design tables for those who use the LRFD approach.

Deflections are indeed addressed in the document.  The IRC prescribes limits for deflection so that would necessitate checks anyway.  I have never heard the assertion that LRFD requires no deflection checks.  Any designer who neglects servicibility will no doubt find himself in hot water.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources