Member Login

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

residual vs. zero sequence ground fault protection

residual vs. zero sequence ground fault protection

What is the difference between the two?

RE: residual vs. zero sequence ground fault protection

"Residual" method involves putting a relay element in the neutral (common) leg of three individual phase CTs in a wye connection.  Any residual current flowing in the neutral of the wye represents ground (and/or) neutral current.

Zero sequence is also known as flux summation and involves putting a  window-type CT around all three phase conductors.  Normally, the flux of the three phase conductors should sum to zero so there will be no current in the CT secondary.  If there is a ground fault, phase currents are not balanced, flux is not zero and there is secondary current in the CT proportional to the primary ground current.  

RE: residual vs. zero sequence ground fault protection

Zero-sequence could also mean a calculated zero-sequence quantity from the phase currents.  Schweitzer distinguishes these two by using Neutral Ground for current in the CT neutral (IN channel) and Residual Ground for a calculated 3I0 current.

RE: residual vs. zero sequence ground fault protection

You can obtain a much lower setting with a sensitive ground fault protection (zero sequence ground fault protection) than with residual ground fault protection.
A setting of 1%-2%  Full Load Current is obtainable with sensitive ground fault protection while a setting of lower than 10% Full Load Current (residual ground fault protection) normally result in nuisance trips.

For additional info see also the NPAG, chapter 9, "Overcurrent protection for phase and earth faults";c=AGF_Product&cid=1089880316992&;amp;rid=&lid=en&pid=1017999014820&tab=Chapters&id=1056536208254

Failure seldom stops us, it is the fear for failure that stops us - Jack Lemmon

Make the best use of
Read the Site Policies at FAQ731-376

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close