×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Inlet to Water Turbines

Inlet to Water Turbines

Inlet to Water Turbines

(OP)
Has anyone been involved with design and installation of pipes connecting to water turbines like the ones you have at the base of a dam?  How exactly is the water carried from behind the dam to turbine inlet?  Does it flow through a concrete tunnel, conduit or a large bore steel pipe?  If it is a pipe, how is the long vertical portion of the pipe supported as it runs down towards the base of the dam and eventually to the turbine inlet?  Considering the static pressure behind the dam, if the pipe is not secured or doweled to something rigid like bedrock, I envisage the water roaring as it runs through the pipe and shaking it all over the place before demolishing the conduit into pieces.  If the pipe or conduit has to be fixed to the surrounding rock or soil, don't we still have to allow for thermal induced longitudinal expansion of the pipe? Is the support system I am imagining close to reality at all?  What are the commonly used technics in the industry for holding these kind of pipes in their place and for restraining the flow induced vibrations? especially in vertical runs.
I should emphasize that I am interested in situations behind dams, NOT piping inside a process plant or risers along side towers and vessels.
Your input is highly appreciated.

Regards,

drno

RE: Inlet to Water Turbines

Long ago I had the privilege of internally inspecting the volute of one of the power turbines in a major power dam across the St. Lawrence River.  There is no 'pipe' upstream of the turbines.

The upper face of the dam is almost entirely covered with 'trash racks', large coarse screens.  By large, I mean maybe fifty or sixty feet square, maybe bigger.  Each extends for nearly the full depth of the dam and the full inter- turbine pitch distance.  The air gap in the generators measures about an inch radially, and 12 feet in diameter.  Each generator produces ~1200 amps at 1200 volts, 60hz.  My friend Newt, a farm boy, opined that it would 'make a right good welder'.

[
Contrary to what's been expressed in the popular press, trash racks have nothing to do with keeping fish out of turbines.  Fish are exquisitely sensitive to horizontal currents, which is why a school of fish changes direction all at once, and why any water intake with horizontal flow is not going to catch fish; they just swim away from it, if it's large enough to keep the velocity low enough for them to swim against.  Intakes with a vertical flow are guaranteed to catch fish.  Trash racks are for trash, like telephone poles and errant boats.
]

Inboard/downstream of the trash racks, the interior of the dam comprises a gently tapered spiral of gargantuan proportions.  The smallest part of the volute is still big enough to stand upright in.

There is a tubular lumen downstream of the turbines, extending down well under the tailrace level to an elbow and then an expander.  That lumen is large enough to drive an SUV through.

Every once in a while, they replace the trash racks with solid plates and drain the volute so they can hardface the turbine runners, which is why that particular volute was accessible.

The adjacent turbines were still in service, and despite the huge mass of concrete, flow noise was pretty much everywhere, audible without amplification.  It was loudest at the thick steel access hatches, and punctuated by irregular events that sounded like a big heavy rock rolling and bouncing down the volute and through the turbine.  We were assured that the noise was not from rocks, but from cavitation, which did more damage than rocks could, hence the hardfacing.

That particular dam works with a relatively low head, less than a hundred feet.  Taller dams exist with turbines at the downstream end of long penstocks.  E.g. Hoover Dam, covered occasionally on the Discovery Channel.  It appears to me, a layman in these matters, that iron penstocks are by far the most flexible part of any such installation.  I assume that they typically include elbows just so they can flex enough to not self- destruct from temperature changes and settling of the massive structures.

I remember seeing much smaller penstocks associated with much smaller dams, made of iron and wood (with closely spaced iron bands).  They seemed to be braced with heavy saddles and abutments and such.  I've never noticed anything I would identify as a vibration damper, of the sort you see on aerial wires.  I guess they rely on inertia, mostly.  They do make noise that's clearly audible from a distance.  I've never seen a new penstock; I assume that flow- induced vibrations, surely they occur, cause early failure, and I've just seen the reinforced replacements.


Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources