×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Frequency preference BS7671

Frequency preference BS7671

Frequency preference BS7671

(OP)
Can anyone suggest why BS7671 2001 states a preference for 50, 60 and 400hz? I can understand the first two but where does the 400hz come from?

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

400 Hz is standard for aircraft electrical systems.  The higher frequency results in physically smaller and hence lighter equipment (less iron required)

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

Peterb :  Less filtering,-- smaller caps, inductors, -- too.

<nbucska@pcperipherals.com>

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

nbucska -
Of course you're right that filter components will also be smaller, but I'm not too sure that there are that many filters or power factor correction capacitors installed on an aircraft power distribution system.  The bulky/heavy equipment will tend to be the generators and any AC motors, where the saving in weight due to less iron will be most noticeable.
Perhaps someone else has some specifics on this?

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

(OP)
Thanks guys. Electrical equipment on aircraft is specifically excluded from the scope of BS7671 but I was very interested in the use of such a frequency. Perhaps someone knows of a common use of 400Hz for electrical installations of some type within buildings.

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

We have PMGs of our alternators, that generate the energy required for the excitation of the main field, rated at 400hz. Here it is probably used for smooth DC field current.

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

Any facility in which maintenance or calibration is done on 400 Hz aircraft equipment will have a requirement for 400 Hz power within the facility.

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

So can it be concluded that the 400Hz frequency is basically to allow smaller and lighter equipment in the aircraft? There didn't seem to be a conclusive answer. Actually, I study aeronautical engineering, but the electrical parts are a little off my scope.

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

Suggestion: Visit
http://www.atd.siemens.de/airports/download/Macau.pdf
for airport building providing a ground 400Hz power supply to aircrafts on the ground.
In some cases, the following equipment may require 400Hz from the building:
1. Cranes
2. Computers
3. Transmitters
4. Communication equipment
5. Etc.

RE: Frequency preference BS7671

We have been asking this question ourselves. Smaller components may work for modern aircraft but 400 Hz power was in use back in the days when military UHF radios were 80+pounds (ARC-27). Most of them used 28 VDC input power with an internal M/G to convert it to 400 HZ, 115VAC. 28 VDC was used on most early aircraft as it did not require any speed regulation as an A/C generator needs. None of us can come up with a good reason as to why 400 Hz was picked. Why not 500 or 600 Hz?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources