Buildings' fire controller system
Buildings' fire controller system
(OP)
Hi. Our companies' building has a 6 year old fire detection system. It's outfitted with a PLC that has addressable heats and smokes also some call points and rate of rise heats with dip switches. These devices are all connected in parallel, on a 15 volt closed loop circuit. Can someone suggest a good-easy to understand reference book on how all this communication between devices and controller gets accomplished ? e.g. radio frequency or digital.
Thx
Thx





RE: Buildings' fire controller system
----------------------------------
I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it...
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
Are you trying to learn how to make a fire alarm system or you want to use it for your benefit. If you tell us what you want to accomplish, you may get a better answer.
One thing I know that it is not radio frequency. It work similar to a PLC as you desribed, but not a true PLC.
Mean while try visiting websites of leading fire alarm manufacturing firms, Simplex, Notifier, Edwards, Siemens (Pyrotronics). Etc. Search web...
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
Here is their website, but to be honest it is difficult to navigate if you just want to find general information.
http://gavazzi-automation.com/ac/index.asp
Eng-Tips: Help for your job, not for your homework Read FAQ731-376
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
This may help.
http://www.firelite.com/main.html
respectfully
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
Thanks again all !
-S
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
Yours seems to be an adminstrative problem than technical. Firstly all modern fire alarm system are complex and required factory trained/authorised technicians to work and troubleshoot them. Six years is a long time in this fast chaning electronic world. If you do not have a contract with the manufacurere or authoized service organization, the mystery around the existing system will only keep getting deeper. You need to keep up with fairly regular software and hardware upgrades to stay current on availability of parts and service.
I would try to find a way to convince the powers to be in your company to pay for the services of the manufactuer and if desired send your technicians for formal training.
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
----------------------------------
I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it...
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
Now I have to look up demagogue..in wikipedia??:)
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
OK..found it..demagouge= "a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power"
I would say, that would be an exaggrated allegation..but at least in the USA, my observation is true. Dip switches are the things of early 1990's. Now a days devices are addressed using a laptop and a communication link to the fire control panel. In fact most fire alarm specs (in the USA) are written disallowing the use of dip switches for setting addresses.
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
----------------------------------
I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it...
RE: Buildings' fire controller system
That is one way of looking at it. However I am not saying one is better than other, but that is the trend in the industry here.
I have worked in fire alarm industry too for a while, and I can tell you technicians here hate those dip switches as they pose other issues while troubleshooting a large system, not least of which is to reach out each detector to verify its correct address setting etc.
Other subtle reason to disallow dipswitches is to keep out "low end" products being presented as "equal" when a true multiplexed or digital communication based system is intended. And yes in the USA it is considered "trendy" to go with latest and expensive stuff even if some old technology may work just fine in the eyes of a hands-on type technically knowledgeable person.
Cheers!!