×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Buildings' fire controller system

Buildings' fire controller system

Buildings' fire controller system

(OP)
Hi. Our companies' building has a 6 year old fire detection system. It's outfitted with a PLC that has addressable heats and smokes also some call points and rate of rise heats with dip switches. These devices are all  connected in parallel, on a 15 volt closed loop circuit. Can someone suggest a good-easy to understand reference book on how all this communication between devices and controller gets accomplished ? e.g. radio frequency or digital.
Thx

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

Kidde's system uses a programmable 'analogue addressable' system. I've not been able to determine more than that up to now - I guess it is proprietary.

----------------------------------
  I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it...

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

which country are you in...?

Are you trying to learn how to make a fire alarm system or you want to use it for your benefit. If you tell us what you want to accomplish, you may get a better answer.

One thing I know that it is not radio frequency. It work similar to a PLC as you desribed, but not a true PLC.


Mean while try visiting websites of leading fire alarm manufacturing firms, Simplex, Notifier, Edwards, Siemens (Pyrotronics). Etc. Search web...

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

If you mean that these 2 parallel wires are the only things going to/from your controller to the sensors, it sounds as if you may have what is called a "Dupline" system made by Carlo Gavazzi. AFAIK they are the only ones selling this technology. It works by a system of pulse counting for addressing and data transmission, a crude precursor to serial communications, but very rugged in noisy environments without needing shielded cable. I have never heard of anyone using a Dupline system for fire alarm controls, but I never liked it much anyway so I probably wouldn't have listened!

Here is their website, but to be honest it is difficult to navigate if you just want to find general information.
http://gavazzi-automation.com/ac/index.asp

Eng-Tips: Help for your job, not for your homework  Read FAQ731-376

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

(OP)
Yes rbulsara ,PLC was stated in error, the proper terminology is fire controller manufactured by many for Tyco. As our company refuses to take advantage of vender sponsored training ,we elect. tech's must often OJT on these systems and quite often visit & question the pro's @ ENG-TIPS Forums. Troubleshooting and maintaining might come easier after reading the latest "Fire Alarm Signaling Systems" by Burkowski and O'Laughlin . Anyone heard of it?
Thanks again all !

-S

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

snorkles:

Yours seems to be an adminstrative problem than technical. Firstly all modern fire alarm system are complex and required factory trained/authorised technicians to work and troubleshoot them. Six years is a long time in this fast chaning electronic world. If you do not have a contract with the manufacurere or authoized service organization, the mystery around the existing system will only keep getting deeper. You need to keep up with fairly regular software and hardware upgrades to stay current on availability of parts and service.

I would try to find a way to convince the powers to be in your company to pay for the services of the manufactuer and if desired send your technicians for formal training.


RE: Buildings' fire controller system

By the way I should state that the technogogy of setting the initiating device addresses using the dip-switches is long considered obsolete or old.

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

"technogogy"? Like demagogue, but with a scientific bias? wink

----------------------------------
  I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it...

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

Scotty:
Now I have to look up demagogue..in wikipedia??:)

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

Scotty:

OK..found it..demagouge= "a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power"

I would say, that would be an exaggrated allegation..but at least in the USA, my observation is true. Dip switches are the things of early 1990's. Now a days devices are addressed using a laptop and a communication link to the fire control panel. In fact most fire alarm specs (in the USA) are written disallowing the use of dip switches for setting addresses.


RE: Buildings' fire controller system

ohh forgot my smiley face: peace

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

I've never had a DIP switch refuse to communicate with my fingers / terminal screwdriver / biro, but I have lost count of the number of times when my laptop has refused to talk to some programmable device. Sometimes progress isn't always a forward step!

----------------------------------
  I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy it...

RE: Buildings' fire controller system

Scotty:

That is one way of looking at it. However I am not saying one is better than other, but that is the trend in the industry here.

I have worked in fire alarm industry too for a while, and I can tell you technicians here hate those dip switches as they pose other issues while troubleshooting a large system, not least of which is to reach out each detector to verify its correct address setting etc.

Other subtle reason to disallow dipswitches is to keep out "low end" products being presented as "equal" when a true multiplexed or digital communication based system is intended. And yes in the USA it is considered "trendy" to go with latest and expensive stuff even if some old technology may work just fine in the eyes of a hands-on type technically knowledgeable person.

Cheers!!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources