×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PT Slab

PT Slab

(OP)
The PT slab in question is a parking deck and a roof for a parking garage building. the top of the slab has high and low point elevations. low point being at the drain location and high point half way between drains at 5" higher than the low point. the slab thickness is 8" at the drain so that makes the slab 13" thick at the high point.
the location of these crickets and slope lines are arbitrarily layed out in relation to the supporting columns. the column spacing is good for 8" thick slab.
so the question is how to specify the location of the top reinforcing?
A) should it be uniformly lacated at say 7" from the slab soffit?
or
B) should the reinforcing and cables follow the top of slab profile by maintaining the 1" cover?

Option B) will make calculations and modeling of the slab very complicated and near imposible. and the placement of the reinforcing in the field will be very tedious and not practical as well.
the concern with the option A) is the 5" of concrete that is basically unreinforced or too much of concrete cover that may lead to excessive tensile stresses in concrete and therefore cracking. or the possibility that the 13" slab areas may be under-reinforced.

any ideas wil be helpful...
Thanks,


 

RE: PT Slab

L775,

I agree with your problems with option A. Crack control would be non-existant in the 13" areas as well.

I would follow option B personally and put the extra effort into design. It is not near impossible to design or build. Too may people are trying to take too many ill-conceived short cuts these days to "simplify" design for themselves.

I would normally try to negotiate with those in control to get the high points near to columns and low points at mid span/panel and possibly reduce the minimum slab thickness at mid span to 6" with 11" over the columns if possible. Simplifies the design and puts the extra concrete where you want it. Using small diameter bars in the top will allow the top reinforcement to mould to the shape better.

RE: PT Slab

Why don't you use option C and keep the slab thickness uniform throughout.  This is often done and the contractor simply has to set the formwork at the profiles you've set.  This adds some to the cost of the project, but for Post-tensioning slabs, it creates an accurate design.  With varying thicknesses, you've got varying prestress forces along and across your spans.  Very complex and I'd worry about the slab's behavior.

RE: PT Slab

Concur with JAE, bridge decks have been designed this way for decades (uniform thickness with typically a 2% slope for drainage). Much easier to build, too.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources