INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

HANDLE


PASSWORD
Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Come Join Us!

  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

E-mail*
Handle

Password
Verify P'word
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Member Feedback

"...This was the ONLY place that I could find information that I could use to resolve the problem. So thanks once again to member TomSark and the SQL forum!..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
sean01 (Automotive)
6 May 06 11:33
Hi all,

The company I work for has been approached to re-engineer a test bed for a helicoptor turbine fuid coupling.  The test bed needs to be capable of rotating each side of the coupling at two different speeds (>25000 r.pm.) independently.

The reason for the re-engineering is that previously the bearings the component were mounted in were oil lubricated, due to the high operating speeds - this meant the shaft they were supporting needed to be sealed.  With operation of the rig at these speeds the seals inevitably let some oil past - a situation that the operating company now finds unacceptable.

Is there any way of sealing a shaft at these speeds - besides traditional brush seals ?  The current design features brush seals - which are now viewed by the operators as unacceptable - their design requirement is that the seals should have a life of >500 hours continuous use !!!

Any help would be gratefully received !!!

sean
JJPellin (Mechanical)
6 May 06 12:53
A mechanical seal could be used.  Either a convention contacting face seal or a gas seal would work.  Sundyne gearboxes have output shafts at the sort of speeds you are talking about. They use a specially designed contacting face seal to seal the oil into the gearbox.  We are looking into designing a nitrogen purged gas seal for some of these where the gearbox seal is the limitation to run length.  Depending on the size, a gas seal might be very expesive.  And it would require a support system for the nitrogen.  A standard mechanical seal would be less expensive and probably require no external support system.  Is the seal submerged or just splashed with oil?  How large is the shaft?  Do you have enough axial space for a typical mechanical seal?
EdDanzer (Mechanical)
7 May 06 14:06
The difficulty you face in this project is the reality of physics. In order to seal liquid or air tight, two surfaces must touch. The trick is to balance the contact pressure so that the P/V of the two contacting materials is not exceeded. P/V is the contact pressure relative to the surface velocity of the two surfaces. There is very little accurate P/V data available for dry operation, which is what happens at the sealing point. Other problems are dissipating the heat developed at the contact point, and controlling heat created size change. Different materials have different rates of expansion, as a system goes from cold to hot and back to cold the contact pressure can change dramatically, causing failure.
JJPellin (Mechanical)
7 May 06 22:35
I may be making this more complicated that it needs to be.  We have many compressors that have oil lubricated bearings.  Some of them turn at speeds comparable to what you are dealing with.  The overwhelmingly most common seal for these bearing housings is a simple aluminum labyrinth seal.  In some extreme cases when we had oil leaks that were chronic, we would go further.  A rotating defector on the inside of the laby helps to shield it from oil jetting out of the end of the bearing.  In only a couple of instances, we drilled a port and injected an air purge into the center of the laby to create a pressure dam that keeps the oil in.  This has worked very well in machines at 5 to 10 thousand rpm with some large shafts.  Depending on your shaft size, the relative velocities could be even lower than our examples.  So often in our business, the simplest answer is the best. When we have tried to design more complicated seals for bearing housings, we have had more trouble and ended up going back to the old tried and true aluminum laby seal.
sean01 (Automotive)
22 May 06 8:22
All,

Thanks for your suggestions - there is a good chance that we maybe nominated on this project soon - so no doubt will be in touch shortly !!

Sean
bingopin (Mechanical)
22 May 06 13:10
I have seen good results using N2 purged labyrinths on ~3" shafts at 30k rpm. The application was an Atlas Copco centrifugal compressor. The setup included multiple labys to create a buffer zone where the purge was injected. Obviously, the idea is for some of the purge to leak in and some to leak out. The purge pressure was controlled by a DP regulator using a reference signal from the compressor case to keep the purge pressure at a few psig above the compressor pressure.
shspucad (Mechanical)
7 Jul 06 3:50
helix seal

Start A New Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
Posting Policies

LINK TO THIS FORUM!
(Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum)
TITLE: Mechanical Seal engineering Forum at Eng-Tips
URL: http://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=819
DESCRIPTION: Mechanical Seal engineering technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. Selling and recruiting forbidden.