×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Problem at Kewaunee Triggers Alert

Problem at Kewaunee Triggers Alert

Problem at Kewaunee Triggers Alert

(OP)
I was amazed to read that the Shift Manager declared an Alert.  See Story link.

http://www.themilwaukeechannel.com/news/9040658/detail.html?rss=mil&psp=news

After reading NRC event numbers 42528 & 42530 on 4/27/06, I don't understand why an Alert would be declared.

If a turbine trip provides the signal to automatically shut down the reactor why would the absences of a turbine trip be considered a failure of the reactor protection system?

RE: Problem at Kewaunee Triggers Alert

The plant had lost both feedwater pumps while at 35% power.  The loss of both feedwater pumps should have triggered a turbine trip, which in turn should have triggered a reactor trip.  Operators had to manually trip the reactor.  That was the failure of the reactor protection system.

RE: Problem at Kewaunee Triggers Alert

(OP)
I understand that a turbine trip should have tripped the reactor. But does a failure in a BOP trip equate to a failure of the Reactor Protection System?

I don't think that the reactor protection system "looks at" the feedwater pump logic.  If the turbine stop valve position is used to initiate a reactor trip and the contacts failed to perform their function I agree that you have a failure of the reactor protection system.  However, if the turbine didn't trip why would you expect the reactor to trip?

Had the reactor operator tripped the turbine manually and that caused a reactor trip, would it still have met the condition to declare an alert?

RE: Problem at Kewaunee Triggers Alert

The bottom line is that the plant was in a condition where the steam generators had the potential to lose capacity to remove heat from the primary coolant, and possibly expose the U-tubes.  The reactor should have AUTOMATICALLY tripped, whatever the flowpath is to complete the actuation.  I do not believe that a manual turbine trip would have cleared them from the alert because operator action was still required to perform a function that should have occurred automatically.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources