×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Residential Foundations

Residential Foundations

Residential Foundations

(OP)
I am buying some new construction up in Saratoga, NY.  I'm an electric power engineer, so this is a bit out of my depth.  The foundation is 8' with 6' backfill, 8" thick.  I'm told the vertical reinforcement is #4 at 48"oc (although this isn't on the drawings).  The IRC (and New York State Residential Code) seems conflicted on this.  R404.1.1(1) allows 8" plain concrete walls for GW, GP, SW, SP, GM, GC, SM, SM-SC and ML, but requires 10" for SC, MH, ML-CL and inorg. CL.  However, table R404.1.1(2) for 8" reinforced concrete walls specificies a minimum of #4 at 48"oc for GW, GP, SW, and SP, etc.  What I'm driving at is how can an 8" wall with no rebar be OK for some soils in R404.1.1(1), but the next table specify a minimum rebar requirement for the same size wall and type of soils?  Which is right?  Is #4 @ 48" OK, or is it under-reinforced?

RE: Residential Foundations

If granular soil, the vert rfg may be adequate... if clay, then might be deficient...

Dik

RE: Residential Foundations

(OP)
Without a geotech report, how do I know if the soil has any significant amounts of clays or silts?  Or more importantly, how did the builder know...  Is it typical to design for the worst case condition of clay?

RE: Residential Foundations

#4's at 48" isn't even minimum Temperature and Shrinkage steel in a 8" wall/slab.

0.0018 x 8" x 12" = 0.1728 in^2/ft

0.20in^2 / 4ft = 0.050 in^2/ft

#4's at 4'O.C. is not worth anything structurally is my punchline.

RE: Residential Foundations

In Ontario, the code allows for 8" CMU (unreinforced) walls and in Manitoba, the norm for residential is to use 3 - 20M
horiz?... I don't know what local codes permit and how much they rely on the flexural strength of plain concrete...

Dik

RE: Residential Foundations

Another point to remember about the IRC is that it's prescriptive.  You can spec your wall based on the unreinforced table OR you can spec it based on the reinforced table, OR you can design by ACI.  An inspector is only going to make sure that it meets one of these requirements and then move on.

RE: Residential Foundations

For years here in New England the concrete walls were 8" with no reinforcing or footing. The large majority are still crack free. Our soil is mostly sands and gravels.

The passive soil loads without water are low, its the weight of water and ground surcharge that will fail an unreinforced wall. (#4@48" I consider unreinforced)

RE: Residential Foundations

Most of the time 8 ft tall 8 inch thick with 6 feet of backfill will be OK. Exceptions are; sloped site (toward the house) very bad clayey soil or otherwise problematic soils.
You could consider the wall as plain concrete in bending (allowable stress is something like 5 x.65 x sqr. rt. f'c or 178psi for 3000psi concrete.
Can't answer why the tables don't jibe other than the prescriptive comment by ctcray.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources