×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

degrees of freedom in solid
3

degrees of freedom in solid

degrees of freedom in solid

(OP)
Hi friends,

I have just started learning fea.
I have a basic fea question.
My question is why there are 3 degrees of freedom in solid. Why there are no rotational degrees of freedom in 3D elements unlike in 2D elements.

RE: degrees of freedom in solid

There are three translational degrees of freedom in a 3D universe. For two dimensional bodies there are two degrees of freedom with some assumption made about the third, ie. plane strain or axisymmetric bodies. For shells there are 6 degrees of freedom - 3 translational, 3 rotational. The rotational degrees of freedom define the displacement in the thickness direction. 3D solids don't need this as the behaviour in that direction is defined by the translational displacement.

corus

RE: degrees of freedom in solid

2
Taking Corus's answer a bit further, it is by introducing the concept of rotation that we are able to model (some) three dimensional objects as two or one dimensional objects.

RE: degrees of freedom in solid

Solid Elements with 6 dof per node hasn't been very succesful numerically. Although they are very useful in some applications where you require to combine with shells (delamination problem), or when are combined and beam elements (modeling of bridges).
Formulation of elements with rotational dofs are more complicated than traditional elements, because you have to maintain continuity of the displacements and their derivatives. Ansys had a solid element with 6 dofs some time ago, the formulation was based on a hybrid of stresses.

RE: degrees of freedom in solid

kudos to Denial for his/her succinct and accurate description of the reason why rotational degrees of freedom are sometimes used in the basis or parent elements

RE: degrees of freedom in solid

In general one can distinguish between solid elements which typically have only translational DOFs and structural elements which may include also rotational DOFs (e.g.,beams, structural shells).

The type of the DOFs (traslational, rotational , temperature etc.) contained in element formulation has little to do with the element dimensionality (2D, 3D) but rather depends on the underlying theory the element formulation is derived from.

I suspect you used a structural element type for your 2D model and a solid continuum element type for the 3D model.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources