×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rafter load sharing
4

Rafter load sharing

Rafter load sharing

(OP)
Let's say a single, concentrated load P is applied to one rafter (upper chord) of a wood truss roof (near that rafter's midspan), rafter spacing is 16 inch on centers, rafters are 2x6 No. 2 southern pine, roof is typical asphalt shingle, and assume typical residential roof sheathing (panels) underneath shingles.  What percentage of P would one typically apply to that rafter for analysis, and what percentage would be shared by the two adjacent rafters?

And, secondly, same question except, what if P is applied not exactly above one rafter but instead somewhere in between two rafters (and sheathing is assumed adequate to transmit the load)?  Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks.

RE: Rafter load sharing

In the past I would have looked to some note which indicated such load sharing (...was for RC concrete joist, where load sharing is no doubt more complete).

In any case as of now you can solve this easily with a 3D model in RISA 3D or any 3D FEM structural analysis package. If you make several cases you may even complete a parametric study about the question you ask.

RE: Rafter load sharing

The repetative member factor in the wood code is appropriate for this case.  If the load is in between the rafters, then the load is shared by the adjacent rafters (P/2 to each rafter), and the repetative member factor also applies.

RE: Rafter load sharing

If load is directly on the rafter, apply all of load to rafter.  If on sheathing between two rafters, distribute according to location (i.e, if half way, distribute 50/50, etc.).  Even though some load sharing does occur, its quantity varies with several conditions such as whether there is a sheathing joint under the load, or where the sheathing joint occurs relative to the load.

RE: Rafter load sharing

(OP)
What would NDS Sect. 15.1.1 mean, then, for my first question (paragraph 1 of original post), when P is directly above one rafter?  (And assume for the question no sheathing joint occurs at nor adjacent to rafter.)  Thanks.

RE: Rafter load sharing

The position of the load along the span also has influence. Amidst the span, if there is continuity, you will have adjacent joists' collaboration, Contrarily, very small you will have if your load is quite close to the support of the joist. For uniform loads, any closed form proposition answering your question can't be but a statistical reduction (and simplification).

RE: Rafter load sharing

If you have an actual situation where this condition occurs, why not introduce solid bridging between adjacent rafters at the point of the load. Then you can be assured that all three rafters will share the load more or less equally.

RE: Rafter load sharing

NDS 1997 Section 15.1.1 appears to be oriented more to beams supporting heavy timber plank floors rather than the flexible roof covering mentioned in the original question. My recommendation is to use only the repetitive member factor (as posted by Zulak)and place all the load on the one truss, or a proportional division for two.

RE: Rafter load sharing

(OP)
Thanks for your comments.  Admittedly Sect. 15.1.1 is too cryptic, in my opinion.  I had gotten the impression "2 inch plank" meant "2 inch wide (i.e., 1x2) planks"; and then when I saw "laminated," I got the impression they were referring to "plywood."  You're interpreting "2 inch plank" as "2 inch thick plank."  I assume you're also referring to 2x4 lumber (actually only 1.5 inch thick) nailed flatwise...included in the "2 inch plank" group?  Any other interpretations or comments out there on 15.1.1 are greatly appreciated.

And, redhead, or anyone else:  What might that solid bridging you mentioned look like and how might it be configured at lowest cost (minimum change) to an already completed building?  Thanks.

RE: Rafter load sharing

One Australian standard that has a bearing on this question is AS 1684.1 - 1999 - Residential Timber Framed Construction: Design Criteria

For RAFTERS Live loads this code states that concentrated loads and partial area loads may be factored in accordance with AS 1720.1, assuming the crossing members are battens with rigidity and spacing as follows:

1. Sheet roofs: EcIc = 2.7*10^9 Nmm2 and spacing = 1200 mm;
2. Tile roofs: EcIc = 380*10^6 Nmm2 and spacing = 330 mm.

The factors are g42 for concentrated and g43 for partial area loads respectively.

AS 1720.1 - 1997 - Timber Structures Part 1: Design methods gives the following procedure for finding g42. The procedure is set out here so that it may be processed in any word processor document, using MATHSERV, which may be downloaded from:

http://www.engs-comp.com/mathserv/

Set magnitude of point load in kN, P = 1.1

Select only one flexural rigidity from the following two:
1. tile roof batten in Nmm2, ECIC = 380*10^6 := 380000000.
2. sheet roof batten in Nmm2, ECIC = 2.7*10^9 := 2700000000.

Select only one spacing from the following two:
1. tile batten spacing in mm, S = 330
2. sheet roof batten spacing in mm, S = 1200

Rafter modulus of elasticity in MPa, EB = 7900
Rafter moment of inertia in mm4, IB = 35*170^3/12 := 14329583.3333
Rafter span in mm, L = 3600
Rafter spacing in mm, RS = 600
Number of crossing members, NC = floor(L/S) := 10

Then HB = EB*IB/L^3 := 2.4263
HC = ECIC/RS^3 := 1.7593
G42 = 0.2*log10(HB/(NC*HC))+0.95 := 0.7779

Finally effective load in kN, PEFF = G42*P := 0.8557

Regards, Helmut

http://www.engs-comp.com/

RE: Rafter load sharing

Vonlueke:
The solid bridging would be a 2x of the same depth as the rafters and can be attached to them with joist hangers at each end. This detail can apply to new or existing construction.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources