Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Donate Today!

Do you enjoy these
technical forums?
Donate Today! Click Here

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

bbakk (Civil/Environmental)
4 Jan 02 19:15
What guidelines might I follow for the following:

Beginning at a 4 way intersection my roadway width is 30' transitioning down to a 24' roadway width.  I do not think that "L=[W(S)^2]/60" (20-25 mph) applies as I am not reducing the number of lanes or using the transition as a speed reducer or accelerator lane.  I am assuming that I will be designing for comfort.  Where might I find a typical transition guideline for this paticular case?

thank you in advance,

bbakk
ishvaaag (Structural)
5 Jan 02 8:25
If you have the resources, design the transition as the code mandates...you won't be the sole one driving your roadway. Nor to say if there is some public body checking the design.
CarlB (Civil/Environmental)
21 Jan 02 17:14
The 'offset' in the transition formula applies to the travelled lane - so if your shoulder width is constant, the lane width transition is just 3' (15' to 12'), which gives you about 30' transition if I used your formula correctly. Another formula often applied is the 'speed:1' which would gove you 3x25 or 75'. These aren't very long transitions, and you may want to have them for reasons other than traffic safety (aesthetics, snow-plowing, etc.)  
chrisj (Civil/Environmental)
1 Apr 02 16:58
I generally transition pavement widths at a rate of 30:1 when tying into an existing butt section on a road.  That rate seems to work well on many roadway types and it is a smooth transiton.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close