What should I upgrade for improved performance?
What should I upgrade for improved performance?
(OP)
Here's the specs on my current computer.
It starts to get pretty slow when I work with large assemblies. The regeneration time and editing become very slow. If I try to move a sliding part it often moves very slow and takes a while to get it started.
Dell Precision360
P4 2.8 GHz
Nvidia Quadro FX500/FX600 w/128mb(That's what is listed)
Windows XP SP2
1GB ram
I don't know enough about computers themselves to understand what is limiting the performance.
Please offer any suggestions!
Thanks.
It starts to get pretty slow when I work with large assemblies. The regeneration time and editing become very slow. If I try to move a sliding part it often moves very slow and takes a while to get it started.
Dell Precision360
P4 2.8 GHz
Nvidia Quadro FX500/FX600 w/128mb(That's what is listed)
Windows XP SP2
1GB ram
I don't know enough about computers themselves to understand what is limiting the performance.
Please offer any suggestions!
Thanks.






RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
ht
Upgrade to 2GB RAM
Use the /3GB switch:-
http://ww
http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.php
Helpful SW websites FAQ559-520
How to get answers to your SW questions FAQ559-1091
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
Are you working locally or over a network?
Helpful SW websites FAQ559-520
How to get answers to your SW questions FAQ559-1091
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
In my opinion it would not be wise to spend much on this system, as the next worthwile graphics card upgrade is the FX1400 and that card is PCIe (as are all modern cards). The faster (dualcore) cpu's also use different mainboards.
Stefan Hamminga
EngIT Solutions
CSWP/Mechanical designer/AI student
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
Jeff Mowry
www.industrialdesignhaus.com
Reason trumps all. And awe trumps reason.
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
I used to work over a network and I had a lot of trouble with speed & crashing. I've since changed to working on my hard drive and periodically backing up to the network.
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
Stefan Hamminga
EngIT Solutions
CSWP/Mechanical designer/AI student
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
Tools > Assembly Statistics
Any more than 300 and you are highly likely to get performance & instability problems.
Helpful SW websites FAQ559-520
How to get answers to your SW questions FAQ559-1091
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
How would you minimize this though in a large assembly?
StefanHamminga, I don't even understand what you are talking about regarding networks. I'm handcuffed as far as any change there anyway. I'll be limited to easy computer upgrades.
Sounds like additional Ram is the thing to start with.
Thanks.
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
Jeff Mowry
www.industrialdesignhaus.com
Reason trumps all. And awe trumps reason.
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
and although old this still has some valid points;
http
Also take a look at the Rules Of Thumb section at http://mysite.verizon.net/mjlombard/
In particular the Tools Options Settings for SW2006 and Large Assemblies
Helpful SW websites FAQ559-520
How to get answers to your SW questions FAQ559-1091
RE: What should I upgrade for improved performance?
You're close to pushing the envelope on top-level mates. If there's any way to push some groups of components into sub-assemblies then I strongly suggest doing that. This might mess with your design logic (i.e. actual BOM structure versus an assembly file structure organized for better performance) in some ways but should improve the performance by minimizing the number of mates at the top level.
For example, if your assembly has patterns of components you might consider pushing those into a separate sub-assembly and patterning there. I worked on electric motors (at least as many parts as you're talking about) in a previous job and we used sub-assemblies to mate the polesets on common reference geometry (an axis of revolution, plus a distance mate, and one or two more mates for orientation). In the end the top-level assembly ended up with ~10 total components.
My suggestion for hardware upgrades would be additional RAM (as much as you can fit in the box - similar to what others have already suggested) and a better graphics card (128Mb used to cut it but is probably closer to a minimum requirement these days - I haven't personally looked into this though). Personally, I have seen significant improvement in performance when doing these two things alone. Especially for the amount of money one spends versus a whole new system.
Also, I assume you're using lightweight components in the assembly as well. I don't think anyone mentioned that. Try not to force everything to load into memory. Chances are you don't need most of the components to be resolved at any given moment.
Good luck!
Chris Gervais