×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

(OP)
Does anyone know the origin of NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) (05 addition)? i.e. what was the reason behind creating this article.

RE: NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

From what I can see the paragraph you reference is unchanged in 2005 (and 2002).  Is there a typo in your reference?  All this says is that you have to use the worst-case ampacity if you come up with two different values from NEC tables or calculations, you have to use the worst-case, subject to the exception given below.  

RE: NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

The origin would seem to be common sense. Or possibly the lack of it at some point alerted the NFPA to its necessity.

RE: NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

(OP)
Thank you everyone for your response.  I agree it is common sense, but I need to know what was the thinking or reason in the industry to have this Article added.  i.e.there could have been an accident in the industry due to an engineer choosing the highest ampacity for multiple installations, so NFPA added this to prevent future problems.  I am asking this because I am trying to convince some others of this Article and how it applies to a cable installed in underground to free air(mutiple installations), in which case this Article shall determine which NEC table to use.

RE: NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

FWIW, this provision has been in the NEC since at least 1996.  I don't know when it was added.  It was not there in 1978, which is the oldest code book I have here in the office.

If you have an installation that is required to meet the NEC, then it is really not a good idea to start trying to second-guess why it says what it does.  You have to meet the requirement whether you like it or not and whether or not it makes any sense.  If you're trying to win an argument with an inspector, you won't.  

If you really must know the origin and history, you can call the NFPA and find out what year it was added.  The process for making changes in the Code is pretty open and the submitted requests for changes along with the Panel's decision and discussions are probably available from NFPA.  

My guess is that this was added to make legal what any common sense interpretation would be - you need to use the worst-case.  Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who make a living out of finding the loopholes and gaps in the NEC and then underbid based on cutting every corner that they know about.  Pretty soon, everyone has to cut the same corners to get any work, and the NEC eventually gets "improved".  

RE: NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

The text first shows up in 1987, but without the vertical bar indicating new material.  The exception first shows up in 1990.  At that point it was (c) rather than (b).

RE: NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

This article like all the rest are an attempt to keep down the number of insurance claims for property damage and injury. If you are looking for specific information on how to apply any article in question, the NEC Handbook is handy to have.

RE: NEC Art 310.15(A)(2) - 0 to 2000V Cable Ampacity

The best tools for understanding code changes are the ROP (report on proposals) and ROC (report on comments).  These books document every code change and give a great insight on the reason for the change.  The most recent ones are online at

http://www.nfpa.org/categoryList.asp?categoryID=611   

I don't know about the availability of older ones.  They are also free for that asking when they are first published.  
Don

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources