×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

A stupid ASME vs. ANSI question

A stupid ASME vs. ANSI question

A stupid ASME vs. ANSI question

(OP)
I say stupid to kill myself before getting burnt from the flame throwing that's about to commence.

ASME requires a safety factor of 3.5 for yield strength design vs. actual, right?

Why then can ANSI flanges not have the same requirement? They seem to have a safety factor of one!

TYIA,

heaterguy

RE: A stupid ASME vs. ANSI question

Well, ANSI is an accrediting organization and has nothing to do with evaluation of safety design margins, code rules, etc. They accredit Codes and Standards and both ASME B&PV Code and ASME B16.xx are accredited by ANSI.

Regarding design margins, this is left up to the respective committees that are responsible for their own code rules.

RE: A stupid ASME vs. ANSI question

heaterguy-

ASME requires a safety factor of 3.5 for yield strength design vs. actual, right?

Ummm... no. At a given temperature it would be 2/3 yield or 1/3.5 ultimate, or time dependent properties, whichever is lower. And that's just for the basic tensile stress. Unless you're dealing with local primary stresses, secondary stresses, or alternating stresses in which case you have a completely different set of factors to contend with.

Why then can ANSI flanges not have the same requirement? They seem to have a safety factor of one!

Yup, that's why they all break apart when we hydrotest them to 1.5 * MAP for piping. In fact, we have piles of flanges which have mysteriously broken or merely leaked sitting in the "boneyard". Ok, ok... when you say safety factor here, what do you mean for it to be against? Because the exceedingly large majority of the time a "flange failure" is not a physical tearing of the flange which would be possibly compared with a SMYS or SMUT but excessive (linear) deformation which has allowed the gasket to relax to the point at which fluid which should be inside the pipe... no longer is. Throw in a huge disparity in bolt torquing knowlege and techniques and its stinkin' amazing that they hold at all. Kudos to the ASME B16.5 (an American National standard accredited by ANSI) committee from me!

jt cannon

RE: A stupid ASME vs. ANSI question

Most factors of safety I have experienced with ASME fired pressure vessel were of the order of four and five.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources