×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

K value of side-sway columns

K value of side-sway columns

K value of side-sway columns

(OP)
It is an aged question, but I noticed that it is still quite a dispute among the engineers in this firm.

The question is: in column design of a side-sway frame (no side-sway bracing or lateral support, like a typical moment frame) if a P-Delta analysis is conducted whether the K value can be simply taken as 1.0.

My answer is "NO".

Your input would be greatly appreciated.

RE: K value of side-sway columns

The k values are a function of the boundary or restraint conditions.  They assist engineers in determining the elastic Euler buckling load.

The P-Delta is a method of analysis capturing the second order effects.  This method supercedes the moment magnification method.  

Neither the P-Delta nor the moment magnification analysis replaces the Euler equation for buckling or critical load (stress).  Rather one of the methods is compared to the Euler buckling load. to determine if the column selection is safe.

Take for example a column with a intial imperfection, we don't modify the K value just because of the additional lateral deflection.




Regards,
Qshake

Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: K value of side-sway columns

Often frames with sidesway can have an effective K of 2... think of it as a column twice as long with the point of no rotation at the middle of this longer column... for example.

Dik

RE: K value of side-sway columns

I'd chime in here and second what Qshake says.... the k factor and Pdelta effects are dealing with two different things as stated.

RE: K value of side-sway columns

I agree.  The k factor will still be greater than 1.  However, if a P-Delta analysis is performed, only Equation H1-3 needs to be checked (I am assuming 1989 ASD design), because Equations H1-1 and H1-2 amplify moments to account for P-Delta effects.  For concrete design, the same logic would apply--moments would not need to be magnified.

DaveAtkins

RE: K value of side-sway columns

It is depends why you want K factor?

If you want only to get the magnified moment ,apply P-Delta analysis with K=1 and what ever the k value it is not going to effect because it is relating to the lateral deflection of your column.

But if you like to get some thing relating to K like Slenderness ratio limit or lateral torsional buckling, you have to take the actual K factor and consider the magnified moment from p-Delta if required .

Regards

RE: K value of side-sway columns

i agree completely with DaveAtkins

RE: K value of side-sway columns

(OP)
Thanks for the input!

From AISC 2005, Chapter C, it seems that under certain circumstances K=1.0 can be used in strength design of columns in a side-sway frame.

I haven't thoroughly read AISC 2005.

RE: K value of side-sway columns

See attached link to AISC Modern Steel Construction December 2002 for more on this question.

RE: K value of side-sway columns

well that article is perfect but i do not understand a phrase in this article


"However, frame buckling capacity can be determined if the second-order analysis is taken incrementally to the limit."


what incrementally to the limit mean?

RE: K value of side-sway columns

(OP)
I guess the "incrementally" here means the analysis iteration with P-Delta option. The stiffness matrix will be updated with the step-by-step load increase.

The answer by Dr. Louis F. Geschwindner makes me more confused. Actually, in accordance with CISC S16-94, there isn't a word saying with P-Delta analysis K value can be simply 1.0 anywhere. The code distinguishes beam and column although we can name both "beam-column" in actual structure. For beams K=1.0 (SAP2000 gives a default value K=1.0 for all beams, also there isn't a K required in calculation of Mr in S16-94), end moments will include the 2nd-order effect, which is obtained either by a P-Delta analysis option or by a moment magnification factor (old formula). For columns which are prone to buckling, as per Clause 9.3.3, K will be determined by either Appendix B and C. Appendix B gives the column K values, ranging from 0.65 to 2.0. Appendix C is for K value of columns in a continuous frame with side-sway prevented. In another word, S16-94 removed the K value chart for columns of side-sway permitted frame. This creates a room for confusion.

In real design, I still use the old approach: check the column strength with K values according to the support conditions, which can be definitely larger than 1.0. On the other hand, P-Delta analysis is not usualy my choice to trade off the K value. Quote a few words from a SAP2000 manual: "A well designed building should not have significant P-Delta effects. Analysis with and without the P-Delta effects will yield the magnitude of the P-Delta effects separately. If those lateral displacements differ by more than 5% for the same lateral load, the  basic design may be too flexible and a redesign should be considered."

I hope AISC can make the issue clearer.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources