patented suspension
patented suspension
(OP)
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: patented suspension
Colin Chapman did something very similar many years ago. Apparently the story goes, the racing rules insisted that the standard live rear axle had to be used plus the original drum brakes in a particular racing class.
So Colin fitted the live axle allright, complete with original drum brakes bolted solid to the chassis, and then fitted a very light semi trailing arm rear suspension with sprocket drive.
It was rather more ingenious than that effort, because it had some rear camber compensation. The unsprung weight and camber compensation of Colin Chapman's effort would have been a significant advantage over the leaf sprung live axle guys.
I don't know what the scrutineers said, but I would love to have been a fly on the wall during that discussion !
RE: patented suspension
On the other hand it would be the work of a moment to turn it into a twist beam. I rather like twist beam suspensions, they seem like a very sensible solution for a light car. In this case, where axle tramp and so on is not going to be a concern, I'd have thought they'd work well, with a de Dion diff, rather than messing about with power transmission through the beam itself. On the other hand they save the weight of 4 CV joints.
Cheers
Greg Locock
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: patented suspension
RE: patented suspension
Cheers
Greg Locock
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: patented suspension
RE: patented suspension
Pete.
RE: patented suspension
RE: patented suspension
Ramon