×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Finder's Fee

Finder's Fee

Finder's Fee

(OP)
[I've already dealt with this, but I thought it would be an interesting case study for discussion]

I recently prepared a cost estimate for a pipeline job including a length of pipe that had a published price of $8.45/ft.  In this market, discounts off published prices are very rare and premiums abouve published price are pretty common.

When my client placed the order, the manufacturer called me and said that "since I had sent so much business their way, they would sell my client the pipe for $7.50/ft and pay me a 2% "finder's fee".  The options that I saw were:
1.  Accept the finder's fee and my client's appreciation for saving them 11% on a big-ticket item, but don't disclose the fee.
2.  Accept the finder's fee, but tell the client about it.
3.  Ask the manufacturer to subtract the finder's fee from the invoice to my client.

If the discussion gets interesting on this, I'll post the way I resolved it.

David

RE: Finder's Fee

I work in civil consulting, so our deliverables are plans and reports, versus products.  But the situation is the same.

Markups are the rule, if I sub something out, I add a percentage (which varies in amount) to anything before I "sell it" to my client.  For good clients, often this will be waived, but there is nothing at all unethical about markups, which are conceptually identical to "finders fees", or your grocer buying a thousand apples at pennies a piece and selling you one for many pennies.

On the other side of things - and probably more applicable to your situation - I used to work for a company that made a product.  Again, if we would need to add a peripheral item to the product, we would buy it, mark it up and "sell it" to the client.

Buyers generally know this, so if it is a big ticket item, and/or they want the hassle of subbing the service themselves, they can freely choose to do that.  Usually, as is the case with a product - including a run of piping -  the client wants what any customer wants: a finished product, which they can start using immediately; an apple ready to eat, versus finding an apple field, procuring(renting?) a ladder, picking and washing the apple...kinda hard to do in downtown NYC;)

Remember, amateurs built the ark...professionals built the Titanic. -Steve

RE: Finder's Fee

Interesting situation. I would combine Options 2 and 3...
Accept the finder's fee.
Tell the client about it.
But then negotiate (in good faith) with the client about which one of you was due either part, or all of the fee.

My reason for this approach would be make it crystal clear to the client that if you surrender the fee (most likely by applying it as a credit towards your bill), it is coming from you, not the vendor.

www.SlideRuleEra.net reading

RE: Finder's Fee

(OP)
lha,
I agree that mark-ups are the rule and if I was buying the pipe to supply to my client, there would be an explicit mark-up (that would be significantly more than 2%) for using my funds and my administrative effort.  This feels more like a "kick back" than a "mark-up".  

I was well paid for preparing the specifications and cost estimates on the project.  I didn't disclose to my client that I had a business relationship with the pipe manufacturer (because I didn't).

Does that make it any different?

David

RE: Finder's Fee

zdas04
My advice will be to go ahead and accept. Nothing wrong in it,though this far in my life I have not accepted.

This gives you an extra bonus for any deliquencies you might have faced or will face. Even your customer may not mind it.

Recently a customer of mine  in Middle East won a contract for supply of 15,00,000 security seals for energy meters. I was involved in identifying the supplier and getting samples approved,but I have not taken a cut .

I supply castings and expect to make my money this way.Rest all other assistance I provide earns goodwill. Hopefully some good samaritan might help my children.  

RE: Finder's Fee

Not a kick-back, you bought something cheaper than they could get it.  That's because you buy a lot, they buy none or little.  You might opt to share some of the windfall with client, but I would only do that if there was a good chance of future business.  You are not obligated to give money away, which is what you will do if you share the savings.  In fact, the free market demands that you don't, or you will be replace by "more efficient" marketers.

Remember, amateurs built the ark...professionals built the Titanic. -Steve

RE: Finder's Fee

Go with option 3.  However it's rationalized, the 2% is a kickback, not a "finder's fee, and it's going to obligate you to the supplier.  It's sad that so many people can justify accepting a bribe.

RE: Finder's Fee

What is in the contract.

If your contract says after your client accepts the $8.45/ft, then that is the price, you can accept the finders fee. Why, because if the price later came back at $9.00/ft, you would be on the hook for the price difference. This is the risk/reward part of your contract.

If your contract says you are only advising client on the price, but you are paid, for example, on hourly or cost plus, then you need to tell your client about the 2%. In this case, you can discuss who gets what, but ultimately, it is his money because you are paid on hourly, cost plus, etc.

RE: Finder's Fee


What's the difference between the supplier giving you a "finders fee" & you passing it on to your client as an "extra discount"? Does that then make you a "briber"? Does it then obligate your client to you?

The order was already placed so the finders fee was a thankyou. It was not a bribe to get the order. If you went with option #3, you will probably never have the discount or the finders fee offered to you, or your clients, again.

cheers
Helpful SW websites  FAQ559-520
How to get answers to your SW questions  FAQ559-1091

RE: Finder's Fee

(OP)
Ashereng,
I was working by the hour for my client doing the design work.  I gave him my best estimate of material and labor costs on the project for budgetary purposes and left it to him to negotate actual pricing and delivery.  I didn't have any money at risk other than my consulting fee.

David

RE: Finder's Fee

I run into this fairly often. It is a common form of bribery in this area. Maintenance electricians are commonly paid a "Finders fee" on purchases made in the normaL course of their work.  I have seen a lot of transformers installed instead of changing the motor connections for the express purpose of inflating the cost of the project and the amount of the "Finders fee."  I ask the vendor to subtract it from the invoice. I inform the customer that I have negotiated a discount on his behalf. If I had to choose between my charges to my customers and the "finders fees" I would go with my normal charges. I couldn't live on the finders fees.
respectfully

RE: Finder's Fee

zdas04,

If that were me in this case, I would tell my client about the 2% finders fee/rebate. And, I would consider it his. I would suggest he share it, but under no obligation.

Next time, I would write into the contract that the finder's fee, if any, would be split x vs y. Fool me once...fool me twice...

You have earned the fee by your work and relationship with the vendor. You should get to keep a portion of it. Unfortunately in this case, it was not in the contract - hence, it is not yours.

That's my thought.

RE: Finder's Fee

Since the "finder's fee" is not the result of any price reduction in the product, and is, in fact, a combination of incentive/reward for steering business toward a particular supplier, it is, at the minimum, a conflict of interest.   The end goal of this transaction is mostly about incentivizing you to continue to generate business for this supplier.  That's something you need to air out.

I think the fact that you posted this question shows that you perceive something similar.

TTFN



RE: Finder's Fee

Question for ZDAS04,

If the pipe supplier was to take you to dinner or get you football tickets for sending a client his way, would you turn him down?

If the client did not have to go with that vendor, then I don't see this being a big deal.  I would kindly inform your client and see if he has a problem with this.  I am guessing that he will not.

This stuff happens all the time, usually not on the record though.

RE: Finder's Fee

Consider these extracted claused from the Code of Ethics for the Institution of Engineers, Australia:

 Members, in complying with the Code of Ethics:

     should keep their employers or clients fully
     informed on all matters, including financial
     interests, which are likely to lead to a conflict of
     interest;        

     should neither solicit nor accept financial or other
     considerations, including free engineering designs,
     from material or equipment suppliers for specifying
     their products;


Hopefully you followed your third option.

RE: Finder's Fee

(OP)
This is a great discussion.  My total time of pondering this topic was a very few seconds.  I took option 3 and never considered either of the other two.  Like wross, I can't live on the finders fee and my relationship with my client is far too important ever to risk even the appearance of impropriety.

Occasionally I use a product that I like so much that I buy stock in the company.  Sometimes I do work for manufacturers.  In either of these cases if a product of those manufacturers is the best solution for a particular problem, I insert a disclaimer "MuleShoe Engineering has a financial interest in this product, please consider carefully if you believe that that financial interest has affected the recommendation and if you should consider the following to be simple sales literature" and then deduct the time it takes to write the section on the product (and to do the analysis) from the time tha I'm billing.  Frequently I can re-bill the time to the manufacturer, but sometimes I can't and just eat it.

IRSTUFF, I will take a hat from a vendor for my ball-cap collection.  If I'm traveling already and and a vendor is taking a group to a football game I'll go along.  I try very hard to purchase at least half of the meals I eat with vendors.  I won't ever accept airline tickets, hunting trips, hotel rooms, or gifts of substantial value.  Tickets to sporting events are only acceptable to me if the cost is not substantial and if there are other clients also attending (I got a pretty big job in a sky box in the basketball stadium in Salt Lake City once, I don't even know who was playing).

I sleep real good at night and it takes zero effort to "keep my stories straight".  I'm making a great living and the finder's fee would not have added substantially to my quality of life.

David

RE: Finder's Fee

Congrats on your choice. Truth is only one,while lies can be several. Also you sleep soundly,that's a great boon!!.

RE: Finder's Fee

We've always had a limit of something on the order of $5 for "gifts," as well as similar guidelines regarding how many people are treated with such gifts.

In the defense industry, appearances can be as damaging as actualities.  But, it's generally accepted that caps and mugs are sufficiently valuable to be considered a form of bribery or incentive.

TTFN



RE: Finder's Fee

I didn't interpret zdas04's OP as accepting swag.

I interpretted it as:
- My company bids on a contract to procure pipe at $8.45/ft.
- My company finds a better price of $8.30/ft.
- Does my company get to keep the profits? Of couse it does. Because, if the best my company can do is $9.00, my company loses money.

"Do not worry about your problems with mathematics, I assure you mine are far greater."   Albert Einstein
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?

RE: Finder's Fee

Quote (IRstuff):

In the defense industry, appearances can be as damaging as actualities.  But, it's generally accepted that caps and mugs are sufficiently valuable to be considered a form of bribery or incentive.

I hope you meant *not* sufficiently valuable...

Though there are some public-sector employers who don't allow their employees to accept so much as a pencil.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376

RE: Finder's Fee

There are private sector employers who do not allow their employees to accept anything either.

I was in a project golf tournament, sponsored and paid for by the project, and employees of the client were not allow to accept any of the "fun prizes" typical of golf tournaments. They couldn't even accept a sleeve of balls.

"Do not worry about your problems with mathematics, I assure you mine are far greater."   
Albert Einstein
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?

RE: Finder's Fee

I agree with Ashereng (Petroleum) 23 Mar 06 10:08 post.

Your original post did not state that you had exclusively (or even preferentially) spec'd the $7.50 pipe; indeed, you say you didn't have a business relationship with the supplier. You based your initial cost estimate honestly on the best data available.  Now you have better data, so the next time you should estimate pipe @ $7.50 - and here's what I think the crux of our disagreement is - TIMES 1.02%.  Why?  Because it will cost the next client $7.65 to get the item in question.  Why will it be so cheap?  Only because you buy a lot of pipe.  They can't buy pipe for $7.50, because the market will not allow someone to give a small buyer pipe at a loss.

Do with the 2% "commission"/"finder's fee"/"whatever you want to call your profit" as you see fit, you've earned it.  Your client got a better deal than they could have elsewhere, and it was due to your expertise.  They will be back if they are smart, you will keep making money if you are smart, and the capitalist machine keeps feeding itself and my son for another day...sleep well ;)

Remember, amateurs built the ark...professionals built the Titanic. -Steve

RE: Finder's Fee

Zdas04 is not a reseller of pipe. If he were, he would add a competitive profit on top of his cost without any ethical dilemma. He is not even a buyer of pipe. All he did was estimate the cost of the pipe. He is acting as an engineer working for and being compensated directly by a client. Congrats to Zdas04 for the right choice.

Since this is now in the realm of the hypothetical, I'd like to add a fourth option: The whole subject of ethics (especially their lack) tends to put people into defense mode. Just look at some of the threads here. Consider the mindset of the pipe seller when asked to reduce the clients invoice. Put on the spot, he is now in defense mode. He'll reduce the invoice, but future discounts may be less forthcoming. Option 4 is to gracefully accept the kickback, disclose same to client, and adjust the engineers bill to client by the same amount. No conflict of interest and no hurt feelings.

RE: Finder's Fee

(OP)
Stevenal,
In a perfect world, Option 4 would be a great answer.  The problem with ever getting a penny in your hand for even a moment is that there is a real risk of a disconnect.  

For example, a guy that doesn't see my invoice providing the finders fee back to the client has a conversation with the manufacturer and the manufacturer mentions that since I hooked the company up with the manufacturer they would pay MuleShoe Engineering a finders fee like they did the last time.  Word quickly spreads around the engineers in my client's company that I'm taking kickbacks (everyone gossips) and I am eased off the approved vendor list and the engineer that saw my invoice is just confused that he can't use me any more.

No amount of goodwill with one individual could ever be worth the risk appearing unethical to a large company.

David

RE: Finder's Fee

Per Colorado Professional Engineering Law:

3.4  Licensees shall act in a professional manner for each employer or client and shall avoid conflicts of interest.  

3.4.5 More than one source of compensation.  Licensees shall not accept compensation, financial or otherwise, from more than one party for services on the same project, or for services pertaining to the same project, unless the circumstances are fully disclosed to, and agreed to, by all interested parties.

3.4.6 Solicitation or Acceptance of Compensation.  Licensees shall not solicit or accept financial or other valuable consideration, directly or indirectly, from contractors, their agents, or other parties in connection with the work for employers or clients for which the licensee is responsible.
  
This law is more or less in most all states for registered engineers and architects.  You made the proper ethical, and most likely legal, decision.  Your client should bring you some good beer at the very least...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources