×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rack and pinion regeneration position

Rack and pinion regeneration position

Rack and pinion regeneration position

(OP)
I have made an assembly of a rack and pinion.  I have added a servo to the pinion, and can also drag the rack.  I can run my analysis okay – all appears to be okay up until……

 

…..when I return to standard Pro/ENGINEER, I want the assembly to return to a controlled position – this would be done by using the regeneration command.

 

My question is how should I place the rack part into my assembly to be able to use a joint-axis setting that can control the regeneration position?  The pinion isn’t an issue, as this uses a pin connection, and this worked until I tried to add a joint-axis setting for the rack.

 

I don’t think that I can use a slider connection for the rack, as the only joint axis settings here are for rotation, and this doesn’t apply.  Presently I use two planar connections.

 

 

I think that Pro/MECHANISM is a very good product in concept, but I have really struggled with issues related to “controlled position” in the past too – am I the only person struggling with this, or is this functionality not required by other designers?  Any rotational constraints are easy to make, but axial ones seem to be a real pain and a lot of trial and error.

 

PTC advised me not to use Pro/MECHANISM within top-down design methodologies too when I contacted them with regard to a similar problem – this was despite an article on their website last year giving details to the contrary.  Strangely enough, the article is no longer available!

 

Thanks in advance

 

Dave

RE: Rack and pinion regeneration position

I'm sort of confused...

Why won't the slider connection work? You should be able to set planar references and then indicate a regeneration position in the Joint Axis settings. Unless I've missed something...

RE: Rack and pinion regeneration position

Dave,

You can always add a 6DOF joint (redundant) and set the joint axis settings for the regeneration position. This will have no effect on the Mechanism mode analysis. It will work similar to a snapshot.

I use Mechanisms all the time in a TDD context. We create a mechanism skeleton (assembly) to achieve this.

Best regards,

Matthew Ian Loew


Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources