×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Design-Build: Contractor/Engineer relationship

Design-Build: Contractor/Engineer relationship

Design-Build: Contractor/Engineer relationship

(OP)
Just curious about how others have worked with design-build in the U.S.  We've currently got an on-going relationship with a design-build contractor.  We've done about 10 projects with them over the course of 6 years and an issue has emerged regarding our up-front design efforts (prior to our design-build team getting the project).

Typically, our contractor partner has asked us to do quick up-front design for them based on the owner's solicitation package (which usually includes 10% to 20% design plans - always without any structural framing).

The issue is this:  we do a lot of this work up-front at risk, with little or no compensation.  If we don't get the job, we loose the cost of doing this preliminary work.  Do other firms do design-build in this way, with no up front compensation, i.e. totally at risk?  Or do they charge a nominal fee to cover their direct costs (no profit included)?  

Just curious as to what others have done.

RE: Design-Build: Contractor/Engineer relationship

I don't think this is really a design-build issue.  The same concerns apply to any project deliver method.  The amount of up-front work you are willing to do depends upon how much you are willing to risk to get the project or develop the business relationship.  If you find that it is worth the risk, you will do the up-front work.  The up-front work may give your team a competitive advantage that makes it more likely to win the job.  Or if you are trying to get your foot in the door for a new market sector, you might take the risk in order to "buy" the job.  If you find it's not worth your risk, you will either demand payment for the work or work with other clients.

RE: Design-Build: Contractor/Engineer relationship

It would seem after working with this contractor that he knows your design direction and either thinks he can copy it or disagrees with this last one and don't want to pay, ie, to move on to someone else. Last one first; thats the price you pay in this business. just like the store if someone doesn't like what he sees he doesn't have to pay unless you have a agreement. On the copy bit, if you can prove he "stealing" your style you can try to recover but usual that  gives "you" a black eye. A contract can be used but sometimes more then one design house is used. Mark it up to business and ask for retainer up front, sometimes they pay sometimes they don't, then move to plan "B"
  Have a good one.
Rentapen, Toledo, Ohio, USA

RE: Design-Build: Contractor/Engineer relationship

My two cents - I'm not a big fan of design-build at all.  Like you said, you usually only get 10-20% done plans.  So you give someone preliminary member sizes based on those plans, and then if they change down the line someone always looks to blame someone else, or get a change order, or whatever.  Nothin but headaches.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources