×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

(OP)
I read somewhere that CE requires that PLC output logic be PNP (or sourcing)? Is this accurate? I believe that the applicable standard is IEC 61131-4, though I don't have a copy of it

RE: Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

Hmmm, never heard of that before. Not to say its not a requirement but I can't imagine the reasoning if it is a requirement. It seems this standard is a guideline and is not really a requirement. Where is the PLC going to be used (what type of equipment or what will it be controlling)?
You might try this website to get some insight on this standard - http://www.plcopen.org/

RE: Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

(OP)
I may be wrong on the standard. The application is on a very large pick and place machine in the pharmaceutical industry. Our customer plans on shipping these machines to US customers to start, but wanted to make sure the machine was CE ready. I've visited the PLC open site before. Have you any opinion, in general, as to which output logic type is better/safer?

RE: Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

Troubleshooting wise, I believe sourcing is much better, Really depends on the customer, what do their people like and already have in place? Mixing is the biggest problem I've seen.

RE: Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

The PNP is a requirement for machine-tools and safety related equipment. It is a preferred standard for most (all) PLCs in Europe. The reason is that an earth fault will not activate any connected load. And since ground faults are much more common than faults to +24 V (or whatever your supply voltage is), there is less risk for unwanted activation with the PNP output.

Also, inputs are fail-safe when using positive (PNP) logic. A loose wire will not start anything in such a system while it can be seen as a logic one in an NPN system where inputs are closed to ground.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org

RE: Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

(OP)
I've always used sourcing outputs, if for no other reason than the troubleshooting simplicity. I agree that mixing is very poor design.

RE: Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

We use a safety PLC (TUV certified) that has paired sinking sourcing solid state outputs, this allowed us to eliminate interposing relays and meets category 4 requirements.  We also had a design where we used sinking inputs because they were faster, the cable didn't leave the enclosure so ground faults were no more likley than a fault to V+.

RE: Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

I don't believe sourcing is a requirement for machine tools unless this is very recent. I have to many okumas and mazaks that are fairly new for this to be the case. Everyone of those machines I've worked on were sinking.

RE: Sourcing vs Sinking outputs and CE

denison,

Are you sure about that?

And, are you in Europe or somewhere else?

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources