×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

tower structure

tower structure

tower structure

(OP)
One of the most typical shapes for a refinery tower has a larger lower section and a smaller upper section connected to each other through a cone. When it comes to erection of this vessel, the skirt can be easily attached to the lower section.

Can a tower have a smaller lower section as compared to the upper section? In that case, is the skirt attached to the lower section? I would imagine such a structure would be more unstable than the one with a bigger lower section. Please comment, and suggest related reading.

RE: tower structure

It's not unusual at all to have a skirt diameter which is smaller than the largest shell diameter. The design of such a skirt is no different than the design of any other skirt: Determine the loads (forces and moments), check the tensile stress (never seen this one govern...), check the compressive stress, iterate as required.

Suggested reading would start with any text which deals with the design of skirts and VIII.

Don't forget to check the top of the skirt (lower forces and moments) at the design temperature of the vessel and the bottom of the skirt (highest forces and moments) at (typically) ambient temperatures.

The same would apply to flared (conical) skirts. These are unusual, but the same concepts would apply.

jt

jt

RE: tower structure

Single-pedestal water towers are commonly built in this shape.

If the tower is too tall/thin, you need to check p-delta deflection in it.

RE: tower structure

When a proper design is done, a column with a smaller diameter bottom shell courses is no more nor no less unstable than a same height of column with a larger diameter bottom shell course.  It's all in the design when you do the shell/skirt thicknesses calculation to support the compressive/tensile load due the wind & self weight.  You will see such design common on fractionation columns because Process Engineers need to maintain condensate flow rates on smaller trays in lower section.

Yes, the POV is higher for the smaller diameter lower section design.  However, if your anchor sizes are starting to exceed 2.5" diameter than you can always flare the skirt.  Please read a standard vessel design book from such authoritative books by Bedner or Brownell & Young.  They'll explain it all.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources