×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Torque vs. axial force on UNC threads

Torque vs. axial force on UNC threads

Torque vs. axial force on UNC threads

(OP)
I am trying to locate a formula for determining the axial (linear) force generated by the torque used on a 1/4 -20 UNC screw.

I can derive that force for Acme and ball lead screws, but the pressure angle is different than the UNC thread. I can also derive the clamping force or tension/preload in a screw that is seated, but this existing application (misapplication) is used for inserting large PWA's into a motherboard, similar to a lead screw.

RE: Torque vs. axial force on UNC threads

Typical equations for threads like UNC show three components: 1) pitch torque; 2) thread friction torque; 3) head friction torque.  If you have no head, then you have only 1) and 2).  The equation should be similar to this (for metric threads):

MA = FM (0.16 · P + 0.58 · d2 · ?G)

where

MA is the assembly torque in N m
FM is the preload in kN
P is the pitch in mm
d2 is the pitch diameter in mm
?G is the thread friction coefficient

Regards,

Cory

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Torque vs. axial force on UNC threads

A simplified version of Corypad/s formula is:
T=kPD where T=applied torque, k=the empirical "nut factor", P=the axial force developed, and D=the nominal diameter (e.g. .164 for No.8-32 UNC).

A very broad rule of thumb for unlibricated, plated steel or CRES fastners is that k=.15.

If you have a routine need to do this kind of calculation you may want to get TORKSENSE for about $120 per seat.  This program contains many metal and non-metal materials of many different alloys and grades (provides yield points).  You enter the percentage of the .2% offset yield you wish to develope.  It also includes numerous lubricants and finishes.  It's a good deal for the money. A Google search will turn up the webpage address.

Tunalover

RE: Torque vs. axial force on UNC threads

Wish I had a dollar for every time I saw someone get themselves in trouble with an assumed, or even "published," nut factor (.15 or otherwise).  In a typical "fastener" as described by tunalover, most of the torque (approximately half) is consumed in overcoming the "head" friction torque.  Those kinds of "nut factor" numbers (which hopefully are experimentally verified) include the (very significant) effect of that friction.  As correctly pointed out by Cory (as usual), that isn't the situation here.  If you simply must use an equation, use Cory's, or other similar "long" equation, not a simplified "nut fator" value.

See thread31-14960 for additional "nut factor" background...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources