×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

non-polluting fuel for small engine

non-polluting fuel for small engine

non-polluting fuel for small engine

(OP)
Which fuel would cause less pollution in a small engine
butane, ethanol, methanol, or any other reasonably
priced fuel ?

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

Define pollution.

I would expect butane as at optimum compression I would expect ti to produce less nitrous oxides. Also it evaporates very easily which might aid in complete combustion and equal distribution is these are problematic in the specific engine.

If the alcohols are produced without consuming to much non renewable energy, it might have an advantage re CO2 emissions

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

the problem with producing alcohol is the distillation that required energy to heat up the solution and extract the alcohol.
There might be a solution. I fond this on the net:

http://www.opensourceenergy.org/C17/News%20Viewer/default.aspx?ID=1147

And here how it work:

http://www.ovationproducts.com/products/how_it_works.asp

What they show that they can distill 1 gallon of water with just 54 watts. Something definitely can be apply to alcohol.

Ps: no we see massive outlooks of bootleggers and moonshiners LOL

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

MKimagin

 The "54 watts" -a power - should be 54 Watt hours - an energy - of course! (;<))

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

If your going to run methanol you'll need to check on the compatibility of you fuel system. It can be very corrosive.
Second, the exhaust is NASTY, burns your eyes and makes you choke.
Third, you may have trouble with your oil if there is not enough heat in the system to burn off the fuel that will probably get past your rings.
To qualify these statements, these are the things we had to deal with for a Pro-Street dragster we once built.

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

Natural Gas would produce less CO2, if methane emissions are kept under control this would be the cleanest solution.

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

For a _really_ small engine, e.g. one you could run in your pocket, I'd pick butane, because you have a chance of getting clean combustion, refueling doesn't risk messy spills, it's not corrosive, and a worldwide distribution system is already in place, for refueling cigarette lighters.


Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

For oxygenated fuels you have to worry about formaldahyde, which is not much an issue with hydrocarbons.  And since chemically they're partially oxidized hydrocarbons they emit more CO2 per power generated.  Now that CO2 is treated as a pollutant the question of emissions is MUCH more complicated . . .

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

H2O.

I think pollution is a state of mind.
What pollutes to someone does not pollute to someone else.
If it is "OIL" well left alone and not "mined"(drilled) for. It would as it still does, naturally bubble forth from the ground, and sea beds. And is even enjoyed as food for deep sea marine life. I can qoute a scientific american article for what I just said.  
As far as what "material" pollutes more or less depends on what political agenda is at hand at the time.
Its so funny all these elements and compounds are pretty much naturally occuring. Yet they are treated as if they have come from a hostile alien planet.
Strange how the real super nasty pollutants are considered as the most ecologically friendly. Such as Nuclear.
Now which would you want to go swimming in. A vat of crude oil or direct cooling water from a nuclear reactor?  
Anyway the enviro wacko stuff is getting old.  
Have a nice day. Sorry I just didn't get much sleep and am pretty edgy today.

RE: non-polluting fuel for small engine

Butane is easy to work with.  Using bottom feed gasoline injectors and a specially configured fuel rail you can run just fine.  Just be sure to use a 4bar boost pump and be sure the injectors can operate at higher pressures when the fuel warms up.

Been there done that got the patent.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources