×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Steam traps discharging into a common header

Steam traps discharging into a common header

Steam traps discharging into a common header

(OP)

I have several traps that are running in individual lines to a vented receiver tank.  I would like to combine the discharge of the traps into a single line that goes into a new vented receiver tank.

The traps are all operating at varying upstream pressures..30psig, 175psig, 400psig, and 1250psig.  I need some pointers on how to size the common line going to the new vented receiver.

I've found information on Sarco's website on how to account for flash steam in the condensate line from a single trap, but how do you account for several traps all operating at different pressures?

Thanks.

RE: Steam traps discharging into a common header

Do you have 4 different main headers? 30, 175, 125 and 400 psi?
Don't put the discharge of the low pressure traps (30 psi), together with the 400 psi.

RE: Steam traps discharging into a common header

(OP)
I thought I read somewhere that if the common condensate header is sized correctly then pressure differences ahead of the traps are OK.  

But how to account for that in the sizing of the condensate header?

RE: Steam traps discharging into a common header

I think that sending this range of pressures - 30, 175, 400 & 1,250 (you did mean 1,250 and not 125, right?) - into the same condensate header is just looking for trouble. I wouldn't do it. Even if you meant 125, I still wouldn't do it.

RE: Steam traps discharging into a common header

Big problems when a 400 psig trap fails open.

RE: Steam traps discharging into a common header

(OP)

Yes, I'm aware of steam induced waterhammer.  That is partly why I asked the question.  The other reason I asked is because flash steam in the condensate line after the trap can add significantly to required line size.

I believe there is a way to combine all the steam trap discharges into a single line, but I agree with the rest of you that the savings is not worth the risk of a trap failing.  With a common condensate header, the operation of all the other traps would be affected by a failed high pressure trap.

Thanks for the input.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources