×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Safety distance for pneumatic test

Safety distance for pneumatic test

Safety distance for pneumatic test

(OP)
Refer to the related thread,

Equivalent Energy
thread794-26767

I don't want to reply the dead thread. Therefore, I ask this question in new thread.

I got the proposal for pneumatic test with safety protection (barricade the area) around minimum distance of :-
+100 ft. for stored energy 27,134 kJ.
+150 ft. for stored energy over 27,134 kJ.

I cannot find the source of reference for above proposal. It's seem the safe practice from the contractor's experience.

Should we accept this idea? Please share your experience.

RE: Safety distance for pneumatic test

I have a spec here that states:

E = {P.V/k-1} [1-{Patm/P}^k-1/k]
where
E = Energy Joules
P = Absolute pressure Pascals
V = Test Volume m^3
Patm = Atmospheric pressure pascals
k = Ratio of specific heat of air

TNTlb = E 4.8 x 10^-7
where
TNTlb = Equivalent TNT in pounds

SD = 15 (TNTlb)^0.5
where
SD = Safe distance meters

This compares reasonable well with your numbers. Not sure of the original source.




RE: Safety distance for pneumatic test

Suppose you take the volume of gas as a sphere.  Then let it expand (reversibly)- you can then calculate pressure at each radius.  Assuming a piece of plate was out in front of that pressure, you could calculate velocity of the plate and then a reasonable safe distance.  This procedure should be conservative, since actual expansion is not reversible, and pressure is reduced since ball of gas is not 100% contained at each point.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources