×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Large Pipe: When to change to two smaller ones.

Large Pipe: When to change to two smaller ones.

Large Pipe: When to change to two smaller ones.

(OP)
Current plant design is a single 60"NB inert offgas line (mainly nitrogen and water vapour as a result of desuperheating to an operating pressure/temperature of 1.1 bara/ 50 deg.C) to a single branch inlet to the final offgas scrubber (caustic solution) before discharge to atmosphere. Design pressure/ temperature of the Vessel is  "0.5 barg+ full of liquid"/250 deg. C. Line material is class 150 316L stainless.

Proposed plant will be double sized, i.e. line/ vessel dias will be 1.414 x current, making for a 90"NB line.

What factors should I consider in deciding whether go for one large pipe or two smaller ones?. What engineering factors would prohibit such a large dia. line?

 

RE: Large Pipe: When to change to two smaller ones.

I suppose the downtime to replace existing 60" by 90" versus adding a 60" would be prohibitive, or wouldn't it?

RE: Large Pipe: When to change to two smaller ones.

Cost.

Flexibility. With 2 x 60", you now have the ability to run at 50% in case of problems to one of the trains.

Do you have space in your piperack/run for a second 60"? If not, you can always build a 90" new and still keep the 60" for spare.

Cost is always a consideration.

Future expansion?

There are many lines with much larger diameters than 90" and at higher pressures. I believe the engineering and construction should not prohibit using the size you are considering.

RE: Large Pipe: When to change to two smaller ones.

Leclerc:

You might want to look at your required size for the new off gassing line.  I get 78.5” pipe to replace (2) 60” pipes working in parallel.  

My calculation method is as follows:
   1)    Using a gas flow calculator (or any calculation method); arbitrarily set the length at 1000 ft and the pressure drop at 10 psig. Now setting the diameter at 60” calculate the flowrate….I get 156730.878 mcfh.
   2)    Two 60” pipes would have a flow rate of  2 x 156730.878 = 313461.756 mcfh.
   3)    Now, using the same arbitrarily set the length of 1000 ft and the pressure drop of 10 psig, set the required flowrate at 313461.756 mcfh and solve for the diameter. I get 78.5”.

The actual magnitude of the flowrate does not matter.  What matters is the relative carrying capacity of the pipes involved, all of which are operating under the same conditions of length and pressure drop.

RE: Large Pipe: When to change to two smaller ones.

Leclerc,

Correction. There are not many pipelines larger than 90". Actually, the largest that we have heard of is 60" diameter. The largest we have seen is 48" diameter. It's Friday, sorry.

How long is the current line?

How big is your valve? if any?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources