×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

hazards of pneumatic testing?

hazards of pneumatic testing?

hazards of pneumatic testing?

(OP)
Last week I came across some calculations for a vessel that will be pneumatically tested. Test pressure is about 140 psi. The vessel itself is about 18 feet dia x 260 feet tan-tan.

Maybe it's just me but this test seem to be potentially hazardous to health if there's a failure. ??

RE: hazards of pneumatic testing?

Sounds to me like a C3 splitter tower. I worked on a vessel of similar proportions which was field fabricated and field hydrotested. With a vessel this size, a pneumatic test would contain a whole lot of engery.

See thread794-26767 and let us know how many tons of TNT equivalent you have!

jt

RE: hazards of pneumatic testing?

TomBarsh,
         Strongly suggest you are nowhere near during the test. Preferable to be in the next state.

RE: hazards of pneumatic testing?

Go to the NASA link in the thread. I carry binoc's just for things like this.

RE: hazards of pneumatic testing?

For all the concern expressed against pnuematic tests, those exact same pressure vessels are operated continuously for 30+ years at close to the same gaseous operating conditions ( and the exact same degree of hazard)  as occur during the pre-commission pnuematic tests . In fact , for the case where the working fluid during normal operation is hazardous ( ammonia, hydrogen, flourine, etc), the workers are exposed to the toxic hazards plus the increased risk associated with the vessel undergoiing thermal stresses, ovepressure during relief valve lift events, etc.

I am not underplaying the danger associated with the pnuematic test, but suggesting that people tend to get used to , and ignore, the exact same hazard during their day to day work life.

RE: hazards of pneumatic testing?

So should they hydrotest this tank first?

Verify the relief valve works?

davefitz, it sounds like you have some knowledge in this area. What should TomBarsh be ensuring is in the test procedures?

Patricia Lougheed

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.

RE: hazards of pneumatic testing?

I know of field erected vessels in a Polyethylene plant which require an air/gas test since the smallest rust bloom would poison the process. I recall a safe distance of over a km based on the following:

SD = 15 x (TNT)^0.5

SD = m
TNT = lb

This type of test can be accepted by your AI when properly justified.

 

RE: hazards of pneumatic testing?

davefitz-

You're argument is valid to a certain extent. The consequence of failure during operation is typically higher than that of a failure during pneumatic or hydrotesting. However, the probability of failure is greater at the initial test: This is when fabrication foulups will most likely exhibit themselves. By limiting access to the area during the test, the consequences of a failure can be mitigated.

To throw an analogy out here, why couldn't I take the same argument to say that I shouldn't have had to take the PE test: After all, I studied for the test, and I'm more likely to forget something important later, so since I studied, just give me the PE without the test and let me get to work designing equipment. If I mess up on some design 10 years later, I'll surrender the PE.

jt

RE: hazards of pneumatic testing?

(OP)
All very interesting comments. I am not personally involved in design or test of this vessel but I became aware of it and thought "hmmmm, is that really wise?". Of course, I have few other details so it's not really for me to make any professional comments other than "jee willickers, Mr. Science".

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources