×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

(OP)
I wonder what is the efficiency loss for diesel and Otto engine in terms of mechanics and inability to cum bust fast enough the fuel.
I can calculate the absolute thermal efficiency, let say diesel engine with with compression 45 to be around 78%. The real efficiency (I read somewhere) is around 45%. The difference is 33%. Now from that 33%, what part is the mechanical (friction) loss for four struck engine, and what account for inefficiency in fuel combustion (not completely burn fuel particle CH,CO...) and what account to pre ignition (knock) due to necessary timing setting.
Which engine (Diesel or Otto) have higher losses (stated above) compare to there theoretical efficiency.
I understand that this is closely connected to RPM.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

If I understand your question correctly:  The ideal diesel and otto cycle efficiency calculations do not account for heat transfer from the engine to the coolant.  This will account for around 40% of the total fuel heating value.  Mechanical losses depend on what accessories are attached to the engine.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

MKimagin
You are falling into the trap assuming that not all of the fuel burns during combustion.  Too many websites make that claim, then proceed with their miracle product to make it do so.
What comes out of a tailpipe on a modern IC engine, be it gasoline or diesel, is for all intents and purposes void of any combustible fuel.  When you calculate engine efficiency losses there are many, many variables, heat rejection is indeed a fairly large percent.  Other losses are of course, friction, thermochemical conversion, and a big one, suction throttling losses on a throttled engine.
If you assume that there are no heat rejection losses, the exhaust manifolds would be ice cold, as would the engine coolant, and the engine would spin over frictionless, forever.
When we do engine development work, we take an engine and motor it on a motoring dyno at various speeds without allowing the engine to run on its own.  We can calculate what power is required to just run the engine, long before the engine runs any accessories.
We have a long way to go before we take the IC gasoline engine much over 30% and a diesel engine much over 45%.

Franz

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

"What comes out of a tailpipe on a modern IC engine, be it gasoline or diesel, is for all intents and purposes void of any combustible fuel."

True enough, but how much work is recovered from the catalytic converter?

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

Catalytic convertor doesnt recover anything. It reacts with conbustion products and converts them to less harmful pollutants.

Ken

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

kenre- right, thats what drwebb is saying! IF the catalytic is combusting the final bits of fuel/etc form the exaust, where is the heat it's making being used?

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

Some of the unburnt/partially burnt fuel in the feed gas is used to keep the cat hot. Seriously.

Rather more bizarrely, at full throttle many performance engines use a rich mixture to COOL the cat with unburnt fuel.

Incidentally the Prius gasoline engine has a peak efficiency of 37%, and runs above 30% for its entire working range apart from idle. Of course, its working range is limited to one value of torque for a given engine speed.

It does that partly by underfueling.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

kenre- right, thats what drwebb is saying! IF the catalytic is combusting the final bits of fuel/etc form the exaust, where is the heat it's making being used?

Simple answer to that one!  The Heat is used to warm the floor above it, or burn careless hands.

Greg, Sounds like a waste of fuel!

 So how does all this compare with making an engine more efficient, to making parts last the warranty or reducing the pollution emmitted?  vicious circle....

Ken

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

(OP)
Hi all
franzh - You are right that there are losses in IC engine that can't be avoided due to heat transfer , friction..., however that losses can be consider as constant for particular RPM and load.
We can see in last 10-15 years significant improvements in efficiency and power from similar size engine. I did not notice that the engine coolant temperature and exhaust temperature got significantly lower then in engine 15 years ego. Lowering temperature will suggest mechanical and thermal improvements, is that true? If not , so from where is the improvement?
Well, it look like the timing management, fuel management (that include, when and how well the fuel mixture is madded) and also thermodynamic of the combustion itself. All that play significant role .

franzh - is not a question if all fuel is burns, but when and how fast all fuel is burn - You probably understand that much better then I do.
 
What I look in the original question is to find how far we can go with particular engine improvement of combustion when we say: that it, that a theoretical limit, now we have to look to reduced the fiction or heat transfer and so on.   

    
GregLocock - you saing that "Prius gasoline engine has a peak efficiency of 37%" - how they got that? That is high.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

Well, attention to detail.

1) Atkinson cycle.

2) Low specific power output (kW/litre)

3) Low redline -> lightweight parts

4) if you only have to optimise for a small range of operating conditions then it is easier to than if you are trying to optimise economy for all throttle openings and all speeds, while optimising for max power and max torque as well.

5) and lots more stuff that I don't know about.





Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

"and a big one, suction throttling losses on a throttled engine."

This is the largest reason why cylinder deactivation increases fuel economy?

"We can see in last 10-15 years significant improvements in efficiency and power from similar size engine."

What is your definition of engine efficiency?  BSFC?  Gas mileage? HP/Liter?

The increase in power (Hp per liter) is not necessarily linked to an increase in efficiency (lets say BSFC).  It is largely related to Volumetric Efficiency.  It basically comes down to allowing the engine to flow more air, especially at higher engine speeds.  Variable valve lift and timing technology has been essential in achieving this on production vehicles.  Proper tuning of the exhaust and intake manifolds also plays a large role.  Hondas new K20 engine reaches a very high volumetric efficiency because of this, well over 100%  (I think it approaches somewhere near 115% at redline, a very high 9,000 rpm).

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

If you take a 4 litre engine at 1800 rpm, that is pulling 60 litres per second of air. If it is running at -50 kPa MAP (ie cruising) then it is wasting (crudely) 3 kW in pumping losses across the butterfly. That engine is probably only producing 30 kW in those conditions.

So, if you could deactivate half the cylinders and run at 0 kPa that'd be a 10% boost in efficiency straight away.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

(OP)
Does it mean that 2 struck engine that do  not have intake and out take valves have much lower pumping losses?

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

No, it means that an unthrottled engine (either one running WOT or one with no throttle - like a diesel) has lower pumping losses.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

Check out an engine manufaturer's site such as Caterpilar.
Look up diesel generators and the specs often list BTU's out the exhaust, BTU's off the radiator, BTU's radiated for the engine block.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

waross,

I used to work with this wise old engineer who referred to it as the "Holy Trinity": one third of the btu's out the exhaust, one third of the btu's to the crank and one third of the btu's lost to cooling and friction.

Obviously, he was a Catholic.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

(OP)
So not much we can do about internal fiction.
Why we getting 30% loses in to exhaust? That close to the theoretical or just we are not able to properly design the IC engine.
I wonder if we can use some thermo electric effect, on exhaust to recover some energy with out compromise the gas flow.
I so sower on the net thermo-electric generator that use natural gas. The only problem is that it have just 12%. No the greatest number all all, however if you could recover this from exhaust, we could used that for something.
What if we can used instead thermo-eclectic, electro static effect(assuming that there are some free electron in the gas). I could work like capacitor (or heve capacitor) that sequentially getting burst of ionized gas from one cylinder, and push out the electrons from one plate (more like electrically isolated exhaust tube) thru electrical conductor then load (to do the work) to other cylinder exhaust manifold (that act like other side of charge capacitor). Then you will got another burs of charge from other cylinder and reaped the process in reverse.
That look like AC current. Strange, I just thinking ...the system will be open circuit ... and it might work. Electro static is a add thing.         

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

Ivymike - have you got a breakdown of what the 30% in the exhaust consists of?

Obviously a large part of it is temperature, but it would be interesting to know how much each of the other contributors is.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

"So not much we can do about internal fiction."

Maybe not the 'engineers', but there are platoons of tribologists in industry and academia that are working this problem and making some progress.  While 1% efficiency gain may not make much difference to the average end-user, a Toyota executive has claimed that 1% gain in CAFE is worth several billion$ to an OEM. Hence- Big Oil conspiracy theories aside- OEMs are probably leaving few stones unturned . . .

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

(OP)
drwebb
You are right: 1% here, 2% there... and you do know even when it accumulate  to 30%-40%, just from the small things.

Can we divided the losses in very small portion, then in deep describe them, and make some brain storm among all interested, and get some ideas how to minimized the inefficiency on each of it.
Some people here have enormous experience in automotive , some in chemistry, some in electrical... , some have no experience in any thing LOL.
Some of the best idea are from people that have no automotive experience at all. Just the fresh look on old problem might be just it.    

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

GregLocock (Automotive) 25 Jan 06 6:17  
Ivymike - have you got a breakdown of what the 30% in the exhaust consists of?


Am I missing something Greg? Isn't it practically all temperature. There is obviously some kinetic energy resulting from flow past the exhaust valves.
Have you anything else in mind apart from temperature and (easy to calculate) kinetic energy?

========================================================

According to http://sitemaker.umich.edu/mhross/files/fueleff_physicsautossanders.pdf PDF page 17 of 29
the breakdown is like this (all percentages being from the original 100%, not percentages of what is left) for a US composite driving cycle

100% in fuel
30% irreversibility of combustion,
puts 70% into combustion gases

32% engine inefficiencies, (into cooling system and exhaust gases) and
18% friction (including pumping losses, driving camshafts etc)
leaves mechanical energy 20%

2% to drive accessories (oil and water pumps, air con, etc) and
3% lost in torque convertor transmission etc
leaves 15% to the wheels

5% used for heating the brakes
5% for air resistance
5% for rolling resistance


The author comments in the text, that this is for a particular vehicle and the driving conditions mentioned. Most drivers would drive faster today and have more air resistance relative to rolling resistance.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

Here's some specs for a big Cat. Not to contradict but to compare and comment.

Caterpilar 700 kW generator
Cat diesel Engine
3412 TA V-12 4-stroke-cycle watercooled diesel.
Fuel consumption at full load 51.5 Gal/hr
No 2 diesel fuel with 35 Deg API and lhv of 18390 btu/lb.


Heat rejection to coolant (total)              25478 Btu/min
Heat rejection to exhaust (total)              42766 Btu/min
Heat rejection to atmosphere from engine        6028 Btu/min
Go to
http://www.cat.com/cda/components/fullArticle/?m=39280&x=7&id=215813&languageId=7
and download a spec. sheet. The smaller sizes are in a different format.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

Back to the cat convertor thing for a second. Many cars use something called Fuel Cut Tau which actually pulses the fuel injectors occasionally and pumps raw fuel out the exhaust during deceleration when the engine isn't firing. This fuel is used to keep the cat up to operating temperature during long periods of closed throttle decel.

-Jon

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

One way exhaust heat energy is recovered, of course, is with a turbocharger, that is driven by exhaust enthalpy, i.e., both temperature and pressure.

The amount of fuel used in keeping a cat operating is very very small, in the overall scheme of things.

RE: What are the real efficiency losses in IC?

(OP)
shanba , very interesting.
People what you thing about that idea?
I wonder if just using one turbine with electrical generator (not full turbo charge) on exhaust could recover some of the exhaust losses. The electrical generator will provide power for electrical motor that could be connected to crank shaft.

Even if the turbine will be left free running it could recover some power. The turbine will get access pressure from cylinder when the piston is in the lowest position, then when the piston start moving up the kinetic energy stored in the spinning rotor pull the exhaust and the turbine should act like vacuum pump, reducing the pumping losses.
Probably the rotor have to very light     

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources