×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fracture Grouting Bedrock Foundation for Concrete Dam

Fracture Grouting Bedrock Foundation for Concrete Dam

Fracture Grouting Bedrock Foundation for Concrete Dam

(OP)
Is there a method of estimated the amount of grout a fractured bedrock will take, knowing the RQD and desired grouting depth and limits?

RE: Fracture Grouting Bedrock Foundation for Concrete Dam

No.  I ran into this with some rock tiebacks.  They had to be tested with a 10' head of water and regrouted if they failed.  Failure flow was calculated from a single 1/4" crack, but this rock had several small cracks so grout take was theoretical and they again failed after regrouting.  it was decided to grout all at once if they did communicate.

RE: Fracture Grouting Bedrock Foundation for Concrete Dam

You should do some pressure packing testing - it will provide data on how much secondary permeability (joint/fracture take) you have.

RE: Fracture Grouting Bedrock Foundation for Concrete Dam

(OP)
Thanks everyone.  That's what I expected.

RE: Fracture Grouting Bedrock Foundation for Concrete Dam

More grout might not have saved Teton Dam.
  
1. The site geology was very bad, with huge open contraction joints in the volcanic rock (some you could walk into).

2. They did not adequately protect the narrow cutoff trench in bedrock from joints on its downstream side (no filter, no slush grout at the surface) and there were some very high gradients through the cutoff and over the grout cap.  Furthermore, the narrow, steep-sided cutoff trench in the right abutment likely caused arching which could have made the confining stress lower than the pore pressure.

3. They were filling faster than their first-fill criteria allowed, and without adequate instrumentation to track seepage conditions.  The river outlet was not yet functional.

4. The fill was borrowed mostly from ML aeolian silt, with low resistance to erosion.

Nobody knows exactly how it failed, so take your pick of several possible mechanisms.

Surprisingly (to me anyway), there are still farmers in the area who want Reclamation to go back and finish the dam.

If ever in eastern Idaho, take a side trip to the site, just outside of Rexburg, north of Idaho Falls on US 20.  It's sobering.

(BTW, I'm no relation to the Mary Gillette who died in the flood.)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources