×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

(OP)
Dear colleagues,

My customer ask me replace a pressure transmitter voting system 2 out of 3 for a single transmitter SIL 2, I do not agree because the ESD system will be more sensitive to the pipe problems, Do you have more reasons?, or do you agree with my customer?…

Regards,

Rafcu

RE: PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

rafcu

A TUV certifided SIL2 PT can be used in a SIL 2 application. There are many models to chose from.

Does your customer's safety standards require 2oo3 for SIL2? If so, then you still need two PTs.

I am always very leery of a customer's verbal request. The onus is on you rafcu, the engineer, to do what is right, allowed, legal, and to use your judgement. If you have a concern, especially a safety system related one, I would do a lot of thinking and engineering.

Without more information, I can not give an answer, or opinion.

RE: PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

Rafcu:

Ashereng is correct.  Your client will loose availability (i.e. increased nuisance trip rate).  You will have to do calculations to determine if the PFD is adequate as well as if the MTTFS will meet their standards/requirements.

I don't see this as a huge dilemma.  Do the calculations and show them to your client.  The decision is then in their court.  Your function is to give them all of the information required to make an educated choice.

sdl

RE: PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

Please clarify your phrase "the ESD system will be more sensitive to the pipe problems".  Does the customer want to replace the transmitter, transmitters or the voting system?

What pipe problems exist or do you refer?

A triple voting system can use one transmitter with triple electronics for the I/O and processor or solver.  A triple voting system can also have three transmitters.  Either is better for reliability than a simplex system with one transmitter and one set of electronics.  It may be difficult to meet SIL-2 without triple transmitters. Triple transmitters are better than a single for reliability - worst for cost.

John

RE: PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

jsummerfield:

There are many manufacturers that make a transmitter to meet a SIL 2 application (most state: in a simplex configuration) and a SIL 3 application in a redundant configuration.

sdl

RE: PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

rafcu,

In most of the SIL 2 applications that I have seen, the required solution is typically 1 (usually SIL 2 rated/cert) or 2 transmitters (SIL 2 rated/cert or not). I have not seen a SIL 2 application where the required solution is 3 transmitters. I guess yours is the first for me. As such, I don't have any experience with replacing 3 transmitters with a single SIL2 certified transmitters. Again, "Does your customer's safety standards require 2oo3 for SIL2? If so, then you still need two PTs."


With respect to John's post, I would like to add that, usually, each transmitter's signal (any sensing signal for that matter), goes to a single input channel in the safety system. It us unusual for a single sensor to go to multiple channel in a safety system. There are several reason.

One reason is that it is best to keep the safety system simple and clear - and one-to-one is simple and clear.

Also, another reason is that usually, the weak link is the sensor (including element, transmitter, wiring, all), and not the safety system (I/O module, back plane, inter-connections, processor, power, all). In fact, the safety system is usually the strongest link in the safety chain.

The strength in the safety chain, in decending order of strength, is usually:
1) safety system
2) sensing element
3) final element (valves)

Please note "usually", as there are exceptions.

RE: PT Voting system vs. SIL 2

Oops,

"Does your customer's safety standards require 2oo3 for SIL2? If so, then you still need two PTs."

should read

"...then you still need three PTs".

Sorry, bad typing.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources