×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Lighning Protection for Aviation Warning Lamp

Lighning Protection for Aviation Warning Lamp

Lighning Protection for Aviation Warning Lamp

(OP)
How to protect Aviation Warning Lamp on top of the telecommunication tower against lightning

RE: Lighning Protection for Aviation Warning Lamp

I think you would need a Franklin lightning rod installed some distance above the light and the normal large down conductors bonded to the tower steel,terminating in a ground grid system around the tower.  

You probably also need surge protection on the power circuit up to the light.  

RE: Lighning Protection for Aviation Warning Lamp

I wouldn't worry so much about the lamp being struck directly, but if lightning strikes the tower, the tower top potential will be very high with respect to the potential of the lamp supply conductor.  A bit more than 600 volt insulation would withstand.

Maybe surge arresters at the top and bottom of the tower?  An arrester at the top only would just shunt some of the surge to the supply conductor and cause a problem at the source.

At a minimum, the conduit for the supply conductor should be bonded to the tower at the top and at the bottom.

RE: Lighning Protection for Aviation Warning Lamp

When we design high mast lighting systems wether for freeway interchanges, railroad of intermodal yards, sports stadiums, etc..., or just large parking lots, and the isoceraunic index and other risk factors indicate we need a lightning protection system, we generally concentrate on the protection of the lighting towers themselves.  The aircraft warning lights, and other ancillary devices are all bonded to the towers and are basically part of the tower structure.  The important issue is the downleads from the lightning rods for the tower itself, and assuring that there is path to ground for the high energy levels anticipated from a strike.  Keeping the downleads isolated from the tower structure and electrical devices will maximize the amount of energy directed directly to earth and hopefully minimize damage to the facility.  A good source of information is Thompson Lightning Protection Inc. at www.tlpinc.com

Best of luck on your project.

RE: Lighning Protection for Aviation Warning Lamp

EEJamie-
NFPA 780 requires downleads to be bonded to vertical metallic structures upon which they are routed at the top, bottom and at 200ft intervals, to reduce possibility of side-flashes. Do you consider your philosophy of insulating the downlead as contrary to NFPA780?

RE: Lighning Protection for Aviation Warning Lamp

In 15 years of servicing (mostly 500') communications towers,
I have never seen a top light take a hit.  But bear in mind
that, almost without exception, these towers had at least one
(and often 3) 10' to 20' solid metallic antenna top-mounted.
I seemed to be more important to make the structure a good
conductor from top to bottom (either by bonding every joint
or by running a solid wire from top to bottom, and not
relying on the cable shield bonding, although that did add to
the total path), so the tower itself attracted the streamer.
I suppose that due to the higher impedance of the relatively
small wire to the lamps, the lighting decided that it was
just too much trouble to mess with them. :)

Not to say it could never happen, but I would put it
farther down the list of attractors.  I don't think
anyone can predict with certainty exactly where the
strikes will occur, unless there is some obviously
overbearing stable, grounded structure.  One or two feet
up/down never seemed to make a difference, regardless.
Nor, surprisingly, did corrosion at the bonding straps
(except at the bottom).  Apparently the leg joints made
up good enough, or the bolt mating surfaces stayed clean.

<als>

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources