×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Empirical Masonry Design

Empirical Masonry Design

Empirical Masonry Design

(OP)
I have a question I'm hoping someone can shed some light on...I am designing a small 50'x40' structure with masonry walls and a timber framed roof (plywood sheathing/wood trusses).  The wind speed and other factors are such that I am allowed by the IBC to use empirical design for the masonry.  This structure has a gable roof with a 10' eave but the height at the gable end extends to almost 21' at the ridge.  Using empirical design, I have no trouble getting an 8" block size to work along the eave edges (meeting h/t of 20 or 18).  However, at the gable end this requirement leads to a 12" or larger block.

First off, I would assume that the h/t requirements apply to the gable end as well as the sides supporting the truss bearing.  What is the typical framing used to get an 8 or 10" block to work at the gable end?  If a gable-end truss is used to terminate the masonry at 10', is there anywhere I can find details for connecting the truss to the top of the CMU; as well as how to brace the gable truss back to the roof sheathing for out of plane loading?  Is there a different detail that typically be used?

RE: Empirical Masonry Design

I would reinforce the CMU at the gable end for the entire 21' height.
If you must use a gable end truss, there are two options.  You could provide OSB for all or part of the ceiling, thus creating a flat diaphragm that braces the end wall at 10'.  Or you could provide diagonal 2 X 6's to brace the top of the CMU up to the roof diaphragm.

DaveAtkins

RE: Empirical Masonry Design

(OP)
Thank you very much for your help.  I have one other question:  If I engineer the masonry at the gable end, do I design for the full ridge height as your answer above seems to suggest? Or is there an intermediate height between the eave and ridge heights it is designed for?  I haven't been able to find much literature on this.  Thanks again.

RE: Empirical Masonry Design

The literature always seems to avoid the tough questions.  I would design to the the eave plus 2/3 the difference.  After all, the wall will not fail in tiny strips, but as a whole.  

RE: Empirical Masonry Design

(OP)
Thanks, that seems to make sense.  The local highway department here states that sloped retaining walls should be designed for the height at 3/4 distance from the low point to the hight point along the length of the wall for that very reason.  I figured it might be something similar.

RE: Empirical Masonry Design

I would have designed for the full height, but what jmiec says makes sense.

DaveAtkins

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources