Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
(OP)
I'm considering purchasing the Directway Satellite for high-speed internet access. DSL, ISDN and cable modems are not option for me at this time.
I've searched the web looking for positive feedback about the satellite technology and find that a lot of people are very dissatisfied with both the speed of the service and more importantly, the support.
Most of these people are using DirecPC or Starband. Does anyone have any experience with the new Directway satellite offered through Earthlink?
I've searched the web looking for positive feedback about the satellite technology and find that a lot of people are very dissatisfied with both the speed of the service and more importantly, the support.
Most of these people are using DirecPC or Starband. Does anyone have any experience with the new Directway satellite offered through Earthlink?





RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
A new company is coming called Wild Blue www.wildblue.com it will offer Full Duplex broabad with speeds of 4 Mbit/sec both ways Unlimited
Get Directway now if you cant stand another day of Dial-up access
but when wild blue is launched get that
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
internet protocol port 50
udp port 500
Earthlink support says (1) they do not support VPNs ( which I kind of expect to hear but I can't let that stop me...) (2) they have no way to tell me if these ports are open (!).
Apparently the business deal between Earthlink and Hughes is that Earthlink does all the support and they won't or can't get Hughes involved in the problem determination.
So I am stuck too at this point. Since this connection worked for a month and now doesn't.. .I'm especially stubborn about believing there should be a way to get it working again.
Anyone have insight or info on how to break through this blockade?
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
I had the Direc PC one way until late last year and then upgraded to the two way DirecWay.
I have had nothing but problems with the speed and support both. The support is the worst, these people are idiots and to get a second or third tier support person will take about a week of waiting.
If I could get DSL where I live I would Dump DirecWay in a second.
Even when the support department sends me surveys everytine I call them, I tell them how unhappy I am with their service and hardware. I have never received an email or pohone call asking for more information or haw they can help.
SCREW DIRECWAY and HUGHES!!!
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
I had StarBand, and I'm sorry I switched.
Even though the support for Starband was terrible,
and the speed not much better than a good dial-up,
at least I had a live, routable IP address.
DirecWay systems are all privately-subnetted, NAT'ed VPN connections. I can't stand it- I can't register a domain, or even SSH or RDP to my home workstations anymore.
Sure, if I wanted to pay $90.00 per month for internet, they'll lend me a live IP I can use to RDP in, but still no domain registration, no domain hosting, completely USELESS) :(
Say... Wasn't someone working on a way to inject IP via laser onto the electromagnetic field surrounding power lines?? Someone should light a fire under that guy!
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
I'd be curious as to what service you go to and how it compares.
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
Next I set up a hub connecting 4 more comupters, here comes the fun part if you have never networked computers.
You may want to go to http://duxcw.com/digest/howto/network/win98se/client.htm
This will show you how to network and share an internet connection (ICS).
The connection for the satellite (Local Area Connection)
under network and dail up connections will be the one to share, thie connection will be installed when you install the sat software.
The connection for the network will be setup with new IP Address under TCP/IP, 192.168.0.1, you can leave this or change, but the other clients will need to be set for this address to be their Gateway, DNS and WINS numbers.
When all is done, go to http://www.copperhead.cc/ (DirecPC Uncensored !) for more tips and speed up help. Also from here you can run test to find out what your IP address realy is.
More info on ICS:
http://www.direcpc.com/customer/windows2.html
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
I am in the same position you were in Nov. I'm considering Directway. Did you get it and how does it work for you?
Thanks
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
Anway, I was told that neither NAT nor ICS will work well in this case because of the spoofing that is going on. Basically, the way I have it set up, with SYGATE OFFICE NETWORK as a front end is one of the only ways it will work at this point.
Also, the ethernet modem will be available sometime AFTER hughs has it (and why not switch to HUGHS at that point, since my contract is up??), and then one can use a hardware router and all will be right with the world.
Yeah, right!
Eric Mauss
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
Hey, arent you the same guy with the string and two cans in the other thread??
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
The USB unplugged kinda makes sense...if anything does in this scenario. The interfacing of hardware and software and firmware is, to use a technical term, phunckie. There are so many variables, and no one seems to really understand entirely what is going on...leaving it to people like you and me, and once our individual situation is resolved (by getting DSL or using pixie dust) we drop it, leaving it to the next IT person to pull out his or her hair about.
If you are big enough, you through money at it and make it go away. If not, you go bald!
(e)
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
Just found this thread.
I have been fooling with our install of Directway for 4 months now.
I have the dynamic ip version. The DW modems are connected to a W2k box running ICS.
I have several W2k and WXP clients on the lan.
I have them all set to get the ip automatically.
To get consistent DNS (so mail worksmost of the time) I have to specify the DNS on each client.
The problem that has eluded me is client access to secure web sites.
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
I had to switch back to a DW4000 box. The 4020 would not work in my environment. I think the problem was with Skycasters and their lack of realy knowledge, but I am in a business environment and *need* my connectivity!
ANyway, I am running the service through a win2K Pro box with Sygate office network without DHCP. I have a 28 port network with access to it, although only 2 or 3 users are ever on the internet at one time.
All setting are handled by my Win2K Server through DHCP..including DNS servers and gateway settings.
Eric
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
Where I am located (Montenegro, Europe), the weather has to get very bad to cause a service interruption. I've had the service for 2.5 years, and have had weather related problems on two occasions ... only for a couple of hours each.
Reseller customers are typically first in line to get product upgrades such as Direcway 4020 units or Direcway 6000 units. I've got a 4020 unit, and am pretty happy with it. Beats dial-up!
RE: Hughes Directway Internet Satellite
The delay depending on your lattitude can be over 4*22,300/186,000 or about 1/2 second assuming no processing delays. The reason is when you click your mouse for an http request it goes into your PC -- gets formatted with data and shot out your dish up to the satellite then routed possibly to another satellite (via space crosslink which adds additional delay) then down to the POP gateway. We are up to two 22,300 mile segments now. Then the server processing the http request now must get the info you asked for, format the data and blast it back up to a satellite that again may need to crosslink to yet another satellite and then process the data (spaceway constellation modulates and demodulates the data on board the satellite to allow for switching in space). Finally the last satellite blasts the signal down to your outside dish which is now four 22,300 segments. Divide this by the speed of light and you have a lower bound for the delay due to the distance of the satellite(s) alone.
Add more delay for the TCP/IP protocol and you can easily get into a second or more delay. A lot of hardware may timeout if the delays get much bigger than a second. If a bit error occurs after all the processing that can't be corrected by coding the data, then the data must be resent which then adds another second to the time so now we are up to near two seconds to get a bit that was requested as part of a binary file transfer for example.
For voice and video bit errors are acceptable, for file transfer (sending an executable program for example) bit errors can't be tolerated because the application will likely break. This helps making fewer "hops" to the satellite for time-critical data if some errors can be tolerated (voice sounds ok, video looks ok). However imagine a phone call where a half second elapses between you ending a sentence and the other guy hears it--you'd be stepping all over each other constantly making the communication mode to be more of a "walkie-talkie" than a full-duplex phone.
To cut latency a lower MEO or NEO constellation could be used but you would need a tracking antenna or much more powerful satellites with enormous dishes/arrays to process weak signals that are sent throug omnidirectional antennas rather than the tightly focused parabolic dish. You typically have to drop data rate when the link cannot support communications at a higher data rate.
Hey kj_95376--can't you get cable?
Until Direcway can deliver >1 Mbps per household for <$50 a month I think they are fucked. Considering a satellite costs like $200-$300 MILLION to design build and launch (and god knows how much per year to operate and keep healthy) and they only live about 7 - 10 years and realistically the total transmission bandwidth is probably < 1 GHz or so. If you got 1 bit/sec per Hz of satellite bandwidth that means only 1000 Users that are getting 1 Mbps (maybe 5000 using loading models and oversubscription) I don't see how the thing can ever really be profitable -- lets say we have 5000 users who pay $50/month -- I get about $3M / year revenue how will that ever cover the hundreds of millions of $$$ it cost to put the damn thing there in the first place????? Suppose you get 6 bits/sec per Hz of satellite bandwidth (64 QAM?) then we are up to $18M / year which is still way to little revenue so how is the cost made up without ripping off someone??
Inquiring minds want to know.