×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

shear strength at construction joints

shear strength at construction joints

shear strength at construction joints

(OP)
So here's a (hopefully) simple question...

Contractors always want to pour concrete retaining walls in two pours, with a construction joint at the bottom of the wall/top of the footing.  If we call for a "construction joint" on our details, are we jutified in assuming that the full shear strength (2*sqrt(f'c)*b*d) can be developed at the joint.

I've heard that this is standard practice, but I can't help but doubt the integrity of these joints.

Thanks in advance...

RE: shear strength at construction joints

I don't believe you can use the above formula at the joint.

The shear at this joint is carried by shear friction of reinforcing steel passing through the joint and/or a shear key.  Personally, I use shear friction and omit the key.  I believe there was some discussion of this topic here recently.

Keep in mind that the wall needs to carry the shear at some small distance (say, the thickness of the wall) above the joint.  At this location, I use the formula you cited.



RE: shear strength at construction joints

Trying to pour a footing monolithically is very difficult at best. Almost all walls are poured with a joint at the transition between the wall and the footing. The shear capacity of the steel can be used. The footing steel generaly "l"'s up into the wall with the vertical bars slicing in. The "l"'s can be made large enough to take the shear. Alterantively, shear keys are popular. Female keys, that is keyways depressed into the footing are easier to form and are more popular. However they are a potential place for water to collect and can cause problems in cold weather. Male keys, those that rise out of the foundation, can be more complicated to form and place, but not a lot more, but do not collect water.
At any rate you should make provisions for a construction Joint at the walls and the footings. Since the concrtet is not continous, you can not use  (2*sqrt(f'c)*b*d), Although the othe methods will allow you to transfer shear.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources